AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Sohana Tanju Khayer

Examiner Sohana Tanju Khayer appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 68.9%, they average 1.92 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.92
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
8 years (2019-2026)
Phone
(408) 918-7597
Predicted Supervisor
Abby Lin
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-3976
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3660 - VCaR - Robot Control, Vehicle Navigation and Data Processing: Vehicles and Relative Location

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
325
Granted Applications
224
Non-Granted Applications
101
Avg OA / Grant
1.92
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3657 , 3664 , 3666 , 3723
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 68.9% 1.92
Art Unit 74 61.1% 1.72
Group 457 55.5% 1.86
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2019; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2019 3 3 100.0%
2020 36 25 69.4%
2021 34 30 88.2%
2022 50 41 82.0%
2023 50 40 80.0%
2024 57 44 77.2%
2025 74 41 55.4%
2026 21 0 0.0%

224 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 319 4.1% 1.3% 76.8% 5.3%
2 172 0.0% 0.0% 84.9% 6.4%
3 73 0.0% 0.0% 79.5% 15.1%
4 16 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
5 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2019
3.2%
2020
1.5%
2021
5.7%
2022
2.1%
2023
2.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.