Examiner Edward F. Landrum

Grant ratio: 33.7% (25th percentile in Art Unit 3724 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.32. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 33.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.32
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81554
Primary art unit
3724
Work group
3720
Technology center
3700
Applications
252
Granted applications
85
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5567
Supervisor
Marivelisse Santiago-Cordero
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7839

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 41.3% 2.15
Group 314 51.5% 1.76
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.94 489 office actions across 252 applications
Applications with office actions 97.6% 246 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 2.4%
1 OA 113 44.8%
2 OAs 73 29.0%
3 OAs 33 13.1%
4 OAs 18 7.1%
5+ OAs 9 3.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 33.3% 2008 2009: 27.0% 2009 2010: 38.9% 2010 2011: 47.5% 2011 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 25.0% 2015 2019: 100.0% 2019 2023: 100.0% 2023 2024: 100.0% 2024 2025: 10.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008391333.3%
2009631727.0%
2010542138.9%
2011612947.5%
2014200.0%
20154125.0%
201911100.0%
202311100.0%
202411100.0%
202510110.0%
20261600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 246 0.4% 13.8% 72.0% 10.6%
Action 2 133 0.0% 8.3% 82.7% 6.8%
Action 3 60 0.0% 6.7% 71.7% 21.7%
Action 4 27 0.0% 7.4% 85.2% 7.4%
Action 5 9 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 6 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 51 office actions
All years 0.2% 1 of 489 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 19, 2014 12/186,715 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jun. 9, 2011 10/961,248 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.