Examiner Richard D Crosby Jr

Grant ratio: 58.4% (83rd percentile in Art Unit 3724 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.17. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 58.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.17
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91084
Primary art unit
3724
Work group
3720
Technology center
3700
Applications
543
Granted applications
317
Examiner phone
(571) 272-8034
Supervisor
Adam Eiseman
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3818

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 41.3% 2.15
Group 314 51.5% 1.76
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.07 1,124 office actions across 543 applications
Applications with office actions 98.9% 537 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 1.1%
1 OA 256 47.1%
2 OAs 143 26.3%
3 OAs 56 10.3%
4 OAs 48 8.8%
5+ OAs 34 6.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 37.5% 2014 2015: 34.4% 2015 2016: 67.4% 2016 2017: 58.8% 2017 2018: 79.0% 2018 2019: 78.6% 2019 2020: 78.9% 2020 2021: 80.0% 2021 2022: 65.9% 2022 2023: 78.3% 2023 2024: 80.0% 2024 2025: 23.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201424937.5%
2015321134.4%
2016432967.4%
2017513058.8%
2018624979.0%
2019423378.6%
2020383078.9%
2021252080.0%
2022442965.9%
2023463678.3%
2024403280.0%
202538923.7%
20265800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 537 0.0% 10.2% 64.8% 23.1%
Action 2 281 0.0% 5.7% 77.9% 15.7%
Action 3 138 0.0% 5.1% 76.8% 17.4%
Action 4 82 0.0% 1.2% 82.9% 15.9%
Action 5 34 0.0% 0.0% 88.2% 11.8%
Action 6 20 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 14 0.0% 0.0% 92.9% 7.1%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 250 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,124 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
71.4% 5/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 4, 2026 16/331,652 Reversed §103 · §112
Aug. 9, 2024 17/018,236 Reversed §102
Nov. 3, 2020 15/324,245 Reversed §103
Oct. 9, 2020 15/922,120 Affirmed §103
Jul. 28, 2020 15/193,312 Reversed §103 · §112
Jul. 8, 2019 14/264,495 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jun. 20, 2018 14/620,404 Affirmed in part §101 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.