AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Chinyere J Rushing-Tucker

Examiner Chinyere J Rushing-Tucker appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 68.0%, they average 2.13 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.13
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
13 years (2014-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-5944
Predicted Supervisor
Anna Kinsaul
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-1926
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3730 - Sheet Container Making, Package Making, Apparel, and Tool Driving

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
515
Granted Applications
350
Non-Granted Applications
165
Avg OA / Grant
2.13
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3721 , 3731
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 68.0% 2.13
Art Unit 50 62.0% 2.22
Group 288 51.1% 2.22
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2014; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2014 9 1 11.1%
2015 26 13 50.0%
2016 46 25 54.3%
2017 24 12 50.0%
2018 39 22 56.4%
2019 48 32 66.7%
2020 56 48 85.7%
2021 37 27 73.0%
2022 58 53 91.4%
2023 53 47 88.7%
2024 47 40 85.1%
2025 54 30 55.6%
2026 18 0 0.0%

350 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 514 0.0% 19.1% 70.6% 7.0%
2 276 0.4% 16.3% 79.7% 2.9%
3 141 0.0% 10.6% 87.2% 1.4%
4 89 0.0% 7.9% 87.6% 2.2%
5 49 0.0% 6.1% 85.7% 4.1%
6 31 0.0% 9.7% 83.9% 3.2%
7 13 0.0% 7.7% 92.3% 0.0%
8 8 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%
9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.9%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.