Examiner Bao-Thieu L Nguyen

Grant ratio: 57.8% (96th percentile in Art Unit 3732 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.00. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 57.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.00
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91909
Primary art unit
3732
Work group
3730
Technology center
3700
Applications
748
Granted applications
432
Examiner phone
(571) 270-0476
Supervisor
Khoa D. Huynh
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4888

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 47 37.0% 2.39
Group 289 50.3% 2.22
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.02 1,509 office actions across 748 applications
Applications with office actions 98.8% 739 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 9 1.2%
1 OA 336 44.9%
2 OAs 230 30.7%
3 OAs 88 11.8%
4 OAs 36 4.8%
5+ OAs 49 6.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 40.0% 2015 2016: 62.3% 2016 2017: 71.0% 2017 2018: 63.1% 2018 2019: 58.3% 2019 2020: 54.5% 2020 2021: 62.3% 2021 2022: 70.6% 2022 2023: 75.3% 2023 2024: 80.7% 2024 2025: 41.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2014200.0%
2015502040.0%
2016694362.3%
2017694971.0%
2018654163.1%
2019482858.3%
2020553054.5%
2021533362.3%
2022513670.6%
2023735575.3%
2024836780.7%
2025723041.7%
20265800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 739 0.5% 7.6% 61.8% 6.1%
Action 2 403 1.0% 4.2% 76.4% 5.5%
Action 3 173 1.2% 3.5% 81.5% 6.4%
Action 4 85 0.0% 2.4% 82.4% 7.1%
Action 5 49 0.0% 10.2% 73.5% 12.2%
Action 6 29 0.0% 13.8% 72.4% 6.9%
Action 7 14 0.0% 7.1% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 8 9 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.7% 3 of 455 office actions
All years 0.7% 10 of 1,509 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
0.8%
2019: PEG
0.9%
1.7%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.6%
2025: August memo
0.7%
1.2%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
71.4% 5/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 3, 2026 18/555,656 Reversed §103
Dec. 5, 2022 16/383,536 Reversed §103 · §112
Oct. 4, 2022 16/179,281 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Mar. 18, 2022 15/777,784 Reversed §103
Mar. 10, 2021 15/400,206 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 16, 2020 15/249,929 Affirmed §100 · §103 · §112
Jul. 19, 2018 14/028,234 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.