AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Haley A Smith

Examiner Haley A Smith appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 44.0%, they average 2.63 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.63
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
7 years (2020-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-6597
Predicted Supervisor
Khoa Huynh
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-4888
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3730 - Sheet Container Making, Package Making, Apparel, and Tool Driving

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
252
Granted Applications
111
Non-Granted Applications
141
Avg OA / Grant
2.63
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3732
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 44.0% 2.63
Art Unit 47 37.9% 2.39
Group 288 51.1% 2.22
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2020; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2020 8 0 0.0%
2021 34 7 20.6%
2022 34 20 58.8%
2023 47 31 66.0%
2024 49 31 63.3%
2025 63 22 34.9%
2026 17 0 0.0%

111 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 248 0.4% 10.1% 75.8% 0.8%
2 164 0.0% 7.3% 82.3% 2.4%
3 80 0.0% 3.8% 87.5% 2.5%
4 46 0.0% 2.2% 89.1% 4.3%
5 19 0.0% 0.0% 94.7% 5.3%
6 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.8%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.