Examiner Alain Chau

Grant ratio: 71.9% (65th percentile in Art Unit 3741 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.89. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 71.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.89
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90892
Primary art unit
3741
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
613
Granted applications
441
Examiner phone
(571) 272-9444
Supervisor
Devon Kramer
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7118

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 54 64.4% 1.81
Group 444 57.6% 1.86
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.85 1,135 office actions across 613 applications
Applications with office actions 98.9% 606 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 1.1%
1 OA 304 49.6%
2 OAs 186 30.3%
3 OAs 48 7.8%
4 OAs 50 8.2%
5+ OAs 18 2.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 51.9% 2014 2015: 65.2% 2015 2016: 55.0% 2016 2017: 55.8% 2017 2018: 72.3% 2018 2019: 89.8% 2019 2020: 82.9% 2020 2021: 92.5% 2021 2022: 86.3% 2022 2023: 90.7% 2023 2024: 93.0% 2024 2025: 61.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2014271451.9%
2015463065.2%
2016402255.0%
2017432455.8%
2018473472.3%
2019595389.8%
2020413482.9%
2021676292.5%
2022514486.3%
2023544990.7%
2024575393.0%
2025362261.1%
20264500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 606 0.2% 11.7% 69.0% 16.2%
Action 2 302 0.3% 7.6% 80.8% 10.6%
Action 3 116 0.0% 4.3% 87.1% 8.6%
Action 4 68 0.0% 4.4% 89.7% 4.4%
Action 5 18 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 229 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 1,135 office actions
Change +0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.1%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 27, 2020 15/009,868 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jun. 18, 2020 15/002,724 Affirmed in part §103
Oct. 30, 2018 14/627,030 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 28, 2018 13/470,577 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 26, 2017 13/417,380 Affirmed §103 · §112
May. 10, 2017 13/706,445 Affirmed in part §103
Dec. 20, 2016 12/226,552 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.