Examiner Stephen J. Ralis

Grant ratio: 27.4% (7th percentile in Art Unit 3742 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.93. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 27.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.93
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81637
Primary art unit
3742
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
223
Granted applications
61
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6227
Supervisor
Alexander Kosowski
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3744

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 39 52.5% 2.19
Group 444 57.6% 1.86
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.77 395 office actions across 223 applications
Applications with office actions 98.7% 220 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 1.3%
1 OA 116 52.0%
2 OAs 72 32.3%
3 OAs 11 4.9%
4 OAs 12 5.4%
5+ OAs 9 4.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 30.6% 2008 2009: 42.9% 2009 2010: 38.5% 2010 2011: 20.0% 2011 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 100.0% 2016 2017: 0.0% 2017 2018: 55.6% 2018 2019: 0.0% 2019 2020: 0.0% 2020 2021: 28.6% 2021 2022: 20.0% 2022 2023: 0.0% 2023 2024: 12.5% 2024 2025: 12.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008491530.6%
2009421842.9%
2010391538.5%
20115120.0%
2015100.0%
201622100.0%
2017100.0%
20189555.6%
20191400.0%
2020600.0%
20217228.6%
20225120.0%
2023600.0%
20248112.5%
20258112.5%
20262100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 220 0.0% 2.7% 59.1% 36.8%
Action 2 104 0.0% 5.8% 47.1% 41.3%
Action 3 32 0.0% 3.1% 18.8% 65.6%
Action 4 21 0.0% 9.5% 23.8% 57.1%
Action 5 9 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 77.8%
Action 6 5 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 80.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 70 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 395 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 3/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 24, 2020 14/660,689 Reversed §103 · §112
Aug. 19, 2020 15/441,336 Affirmed §103
Mar. 16, 2011 11/128,693 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jan. 12, 2011 11/417,728 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.