Examiner Hemant Mathew

Grant ratio: 50.2% (36th percentile in Art Unit 3742 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.01. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2017
Grant ratio 50.2%
Average office actions / grant 3.01
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86391
Primary art unit
3742
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
331
Granted applications
166

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 39 52.5% 2.19
Group 444 57.6% 1.86
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.77 917 office actions across 331 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 331 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 93 28.1%
2 OAs 83 25.1%
3 OAs 49 14.8%
4 OAs 55 16.6%
5+ OAs 51 15.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 20.7% 2009 2010: 42.9% 2010 2011: 31.1% 2011 2012: 21.2% 2012 2013: 51.5% 2013 2014: 61.7% 2014 2015: 79.3% 2015 2016: 61.1% 2016 2017: 100.0% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200929620.7%
2010351542.9%
2011451431.1%
201233721.2%
2013331751.5%
2014603761.7%
2015584679.3%
2016362261.1%
201722100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 331 0.3% 11.5% 82.2% 5.1%
Action 2 238 0.4% 6.3% 90.3% 1.7%
Action 3 155 0.0% 2.6% 92.9% 1.9%
Action 4 106 0.0% 3.8% 92.5% 2.8%
Action 5 51 0.0% 2.0% 92.2% 5.9%
Action 6 20 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 917 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.2%
2.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 19. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 12 reversed.

Full reversal rate
63.2% 12/19 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
84.2% 16/19 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.0 months
New grounds of rejection
6
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 16, 2017 11/810,900 Reversed §103 · §112
Dec. 23, 2016 13/777,345 Reversed §103
Nov. 8, 2016 11/357,861 Reversed §103
Sep. 21, 2016 14/177,997 Reversed §103
Dec. 15, 2015 11/367,074 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Sep. 16, 2015 12/407,258 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A
Aug. 31, 2015 11/821,666 Reversed N/A
Jun. 26, 2015 11/471,327 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection N/A
Mar. 20, 2015 11/358,314 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
Feb. 26, 2015 11/357,862 Affirmed in part N/A
Jan. 20, 2015 11/837,940 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 21, 2014 11/502,865 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.