Examiner Jianying Atkisson

Grant ratio: 44.9% (21st percentile in Art Unit 3742 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.45. Most common rejection type: §103.

Potentially inactive Last office action in data: June 2026
Grant ratio 44.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.45
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86539
Primary art unit
3742
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
439
Granted applications
197

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 39 52.5% 2.19
Group 444 57.6% 1.86
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.29 1,007 office actions across 439 applications
Applications with office actions 98.6% 433 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 1.4%
1 OA 172 39.2%
2 OAs 118 26.9%
3 OAs 55 12.5%
4 OAs 48 10.9%
5+ OAs 40 9.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 15.2% 2009 2010: 31.0% 2010 2011: 41.8% 2011 2012: 54.4% 2012 2013: 52.1% 2013 2014: 49.2% 2014 2015: 63.6% 2015 2016: 51.5% 2016 2017: 0.0% 2017 2018: 100.0% 2018 2020: 0.0% 2020 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200933515.2%
2010581831.0%
2011552341.8%
2012573154.4%
2013733852.1%
2014592949.2%
2015553563.6%
2016331751.5%
2017500.0%
201811100.0%
2020100.0%
2025300.0%
2026600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 433 0.0% 10.6% 85.5% 3.2%
Action 2 261 0.0% 5.7% 83.9% 7.7%
Action 3 143 0.0% 6.3% 89.5% 3.5%
Action 4 88 0.0% 2.3% 90.9% 5.7%
Action 5 40 0.0% 2.5% 90.0% 7.5%
Action 6 24 0.0% 4.2% 91.7% 4.2%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 16 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,007 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 6/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.7 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 25, 2017 12/484,838 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 6, 2017 12/000,224 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Jun. 29, 2016 11/755,821 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 14, 2015 12/299,008 Affirmed in part N/A
Jan. 20, 2015 12/202,509 Reversed §102 · §103
Aug. 27, 2014 11/626,191 Reversed N/A
Jun. 19, 2014 11/659,137 Reversed §103
Dec. 31, 2013 11/828,672 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.