Examiner Michael Laflame

Grant ratio: 73.5% (79th percentile in Art Unit 3742 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.89. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: August 2022
Grant ratio 73.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.89
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89050
Primary art unit
3742
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
676
Granted applications
497

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 39 52.5% 2.19
Group 444 57.6% 1.86
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.85 1,264 office actions across 682 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 682 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 318 46.6%
2 OAs 236 34.6%
3 OAs 71 10.4%
4 OAs 37 5.4%
5+ OAs 20 2.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 9.1% 2012 2013: 56.5% 2013 2014: 72.5% 2014 2015: 49.1% 2015 2016: 74.0% 2016 2017: 76.1% 2017 2018: 84.4% 2018 2019: 73.4% 2019 2020: 80.7% 2020 2021: 84.7% 2021 2022: 78.9% 2022

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20121119.1%
2013462656.5%
2014402972.5%
2015532649.1%
2016735474.0%
2017715476.1%
2018907684.4%
2019946973.4%
2020887180.7%
2021726184.7%
2022383078.9%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 682 0.1% 7.9% 80.1% 9.4%
Action 2 364 0.0% 4.7% 91.5% 3.0%
Action 3 128 0.0% 3.9% 87.5% 8.6%
Action 4 57 0.0% 3.5% 94.7% 0.0%
Action 5 20 0.0% 0.0% 85.0% 15.0%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 1,264 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 15. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 11 reversed.

Full reversal rate
73.3% 11/15 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 12/15 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 3, 2022 15/851,116 Affirmed §103
Jan. 21, 2021 15/374,220 Reversed §103
Dec. 31, 2019 15/150,672 Reversed §103
Jul. 18, 2019 14/467,900 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 30, 2018 13/474,267 Reversed §103
Mar. 12, 2018 13/339,288 Reversed §102 · §103
Feb. 14, 2018 14/026,492 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 9, 2018 13/716,757 Reversed §103
Dec. 22, 2017 14/031,648 Reversed §103 · §112
Nov. 20, 2017 12/895,984 Affirmed §102 · §103
Apr. 7, 2017 13/470,432 Reversed §103
Feb. 10, 2017 12/896,583 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.