Examiner Kenneth B. Rinehart

Grant ratio: 33.1% (23rd percentile in Art Unit 3743 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.08. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: July 2022
Grant ratio 33.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.08
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77354
Primary art unit
3743
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
341
Granted applications
113

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 36.6% 1.78
Group 444 57.6% 1.86
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.82 687 office actions across 377 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 377 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 190 50.4%
2 OAs 118 31.3%
3 OAs 32 8.5%
4 OAs 23 6.1%
5+ OAs 14 3.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 45.5% 2008 2009: 68.6% 2009 2010: 38.1% 2010 2011: 11.1% 2011 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 16.1% 2013 2014: 17.6% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 5.3% 2016 2017: 44.0% 2017 2018: 78.6% 2018 2022: 83.3% 2022

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008663045.5%
2009352468.6%
201021838.1%
201136411.1%
20122800.0%
201331516.1%
201417317.6%
20151800.0%
20161915.3%
2017502244.0%
2018141178.6%
20226583.3%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 377 0.0% 2.9% 90.7% 4.5%
Action 2 187 0.5% 2.1% 90.9% 4.8%
Action 3 69 0.0% 4.3% 85.5% 5.8%
Action 4 37 0.0% 0.0% 91.9% 2.7%
Action 5 14 0.0% 0.0% 92.9% 7.1%
Action 6 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 11 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 1 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 687 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 15. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
46.7% 7/15 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 10/15 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 29, 2016 12/501,346 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Sep. 29, 2015 10/557,255 Reversed N/A
Dec. 3, 2014 11/920,714 Affirmed §103
Oct. 30, 2014 12/221,593 Affirmed in part N/A
Jul. 21, 2014 11/597,397 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 17, 2014 10/563,392 Reversed N/A
Nov. 26, 2013 11/644,326 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 17, 2013 11/685,447 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 31, 2013 10/582,259 Reversed N/A
Jul. 16, 2013 10/583,628 Reversed §103
Apr. 9, 2013 10/423,052 Affirmed in part §103
Apr. 9, 2013 11/886,399 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.