Examiner Tareq Alosh

Grant ratio: 34.2% (30th percentile in Art Unit 3744 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.70. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2020
Grant ratio 34.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.70
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89735
Primary art unit
3744
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
292
Granted applications
100

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 60 35.9% 2.12
Group 444 57.6% 1.86
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.81 850 office actions across 303 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 303 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 89 29.4%
2 OAs 81 26.7%
3 OAs 44 14.5%
4 OAs 33 10.9%
5+ OAs 56 18.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 23.3% 2013 2014: 12.8% 2014 2015: 17.2% 2015 2016: 18.9% 2016 2017: 39.6% 2017 2018: 46.8% 2018 2019: 61.9% 2019 2020: 50.0% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2012100.0%
201330723.3%
201439512.8%
201529517.2%
201637718.9%
2017481939.6%
2018622946.8%
2019422661.9%
20204250.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 303 0.3% 6.9% 84.8% 7.6%
Action 2 214 0.0% 4.7% 76.6% 17.8%
Action 3 133 0.0% 3.0% 85.0% 11.3%
Action 4 89 0.0% 2.2% 84.3% 12.4%
Action 5 56 0.0% 3.6% 83.9% 12.5%
Action 6 29 0.0% 0.0% 93.1% 6.9%
Action 7 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 850 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 10 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
9.1% 1/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
9.1% 1/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 1, 2021 13/128,603 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jul. 22, 2020 13/846,238 Affirmed §103
Jan. 2, 2020 13/746,020 Affirmed §103
Jul. 25, 2019 13/662,595 Reversed §103
Jun. 26, 2018 12/819,024 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jan. 8, 2018 13/510,055 Affirmed §103
Jan. 8, 2018 12/118,165 Affirmed §103 · §112
Nov. 15, 2017 11/992,068 Affirmed §102 · §103
Aug. 31, 2017 12/902,200 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Aug. 30, 2017 12/866,080 Affirmed §103
Mar. 14, 2017 12/312,899 Affirmed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.