Examiner Michael Leslie

Grant ratio: 77.8% (78th percentile in Art Unit 3745 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.19. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 77.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.19
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78266
Primary art unit
3745
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
1,155
Granted applications
899
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4819
Supervisor
Nathaniel Wiehe
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8648

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 95 67.5% 1.62
Group 444 57.6% 1.86
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.21 1,394 office actions across 1,155 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 1,153 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.2%
1 OA 967 83.7%
2 OAs 148 12.8%
3 OAs 26 2.3%
4 OAs 8 0.7%
5+ OAs 4 0.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 71.4% 2008 2009: 74.5% 2009 2010: 73.3% 2010 2011: 75.4% 2011 2012: 78.6% 2012 2013: 84.1% 2013 2014: 86.7% 2014 2015: 65.5% 2015 2016: 81.3% 2016 2017: 75.4% 2017 2018: 77.8% 2018 2019: 89.2% 2019 2020: 83.6% 2020 2021: 93.1% 2021 2022: 89.6% 2022 2023: 86.5% 2023 2024: 93.4% 2024 2025: 56.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008634571.4%
2009987374.5%
2010755573.3%
2011654975.4%
2012705578.6%
2013635384.1%
2014605286.7%
2015553665.5%
2016645281.3%
2017614675.4%
2018634977.8%
2019655889.2%
2020615183.6%
2021585493.1%
2022484389.6%
2023524586.5%
2024615793.4%
2025462656.5%
20262700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,153 1.9% 23.2% 41.8% 23.5%
Action 2 186 1.1% 19.4% 55.9% 12.4%
Action 3 38 2.6% 15.8% 63.2% 10.5%
Action 4 12 0.0% 8.3% 75.0% 16.7%
Action 5 4 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.2% 2 of 168 office actions
All years 1.8% 25 of 1,394 office actions
Change -0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.0%
0.0%
1.2%
3.5%
0.0%
1.4%
2014: Alice
1.4%
2.9%
0.0%
4.1%
2.4%
2019: PEG
2.6%
1.4%
1.5%
3.5%
4.9%
2024: AI examples
2.9%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 26, 2017 13/710,544 Affirmed §100 · §102 · §112 · §120
Sep. 23, 2013 10/817,403 Affirmed §103 · §112
Oct. 25, 2012 11/674,600 Affirmed §103
Mar. 19, 2012 11/189,633 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.