Examiner David Brandt

Grant ratio: 55.5% (33rd percentile in Art Unit 3746 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.96. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 55.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.96
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
92676
Primary art unit
3746
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
418
Granted applications
232
Examiner phone
(303) 297-4776
Supervisor
Mark Laurenzi
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7878

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 43 50.0% 2.10
Group 444 57.6% 1.86
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.97 824 office actions across 418 applications
Applications with office actions 98.1% 410 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 1.9%
1 OA 177 42.3%
2 OAs 128 30.6%
3 OAs 57 13.6%
4 OAs 35 8.4%
5+ OAs 13 3.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2015: 33.3% 2015 2018: 55.0% 2018 2019: 58.8% 2019 2020: 64.6% 2020 2021: 79.2% 2021 2022: 59.4% 2022 2023: 79.2% 2023 2024: 68.2% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20153133.3%
2018201155.0%
2019513058.8%
2020483164.6%
2021534279.2%
2022321959.4%
2023534279.2%
2024443068.2%
2025522650.0%
20266200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 410 0.5% 8.8% 70.2% 20.2%
Action 2 233 0.4% 8.2% 70.0% 21.5%
Action 3 105 0.0% 6.7% 63.8% 29.5%
Action 4 48 0.0% 2.1% 66.7% 31.3%
Action 5 13 0.0% 0.0% 76.9% 30.8%
Action 6 7 0.0% 0.0% 71.4% 28.6%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Action 12 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 342 office actions
All years 0.4% 3 of 824 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.4%
2019: PEG
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
7.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 29, 2025 16/458,041 Reversed §103
Mar. 13, 2025 17/413,092 Affirmed §103
Dec. 23, 2020 14/928,846 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.