Examiner Tea Holbrook

Grant ratio: 67.6% (39th percentile in Art Unit 3747 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.65. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 67.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.65
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87952
Primary art unit
3747
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
664
Granted applications
449
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3276
Supervisor
Lindsay Low
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1196

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 54 72.3% 1.66
Group 444 57.6% 1.86
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.74 1,157 office actions across 664 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 660 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.6%
1 OA 373 56.2%
2 OAs 175 26.4%
3 OAs 57 8.6%
4 OAs 35 5.3%
5+ OAs 20 3.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 100.0% 2010 2011: 75.0% 2011 2012: 50.0% 2012 2013: 77.3% 2013 2014: 75.9% 2014 2015: 60.0% 2015 2016: 64.3% 2016 2017: 63.0% 2017 2018: 75.6% 2018 2019: 68.9% 2019 2020: 67.4% 2020 2021: 85.7% 2021 2022: 73.0% 2022 2023: 85.7% 2023 2024: 82.6% 2024 2025: 42.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201011100.0%
2011362775.0%
2012201050.0%
2013443477.3%
2014544175.9%
2015452760.0%
2016563664.3%
2017543463.0%
2018453475.6%
2019453168.9%
2020463167.4%
2021353085.7%
2022372773.0%
2023423685.7%
2024463882.6%
2025281242.9%
20263000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 660 0.8% 15.6% 75.6% 7.3%
Action 2 287 0.3% 14.3% 81.5% 3.1%
Action 3 112 0.0% 7.1% 89.3% 2.7%
Action 4 55 0.0% 5.5% 90.9% 1.8%
Action 5 20 0.0% 5.0% 95.0% 0.0%
Action 6 13 0.0% 7.7% 92.3% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.0% 2 of 193 office actions
All years 0.5% 6 of 1,157 office actions
Change +0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.1%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.6%
2.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
75.0% 3/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 3/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 12, 2025 16/595,977 Affirmed §103
Sep. 28, 2017 13/900,315 Reversed §102 · §103
Feb. 23, 2017 13/476,125 Reversed §102 · §103
Aug. 26, 2016 13/102,491 Reversed New ground of rejection §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.