Examiner John Zaleskas

Grant ratio: 55.2% (7th percentile in Art Unit 3747 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.22. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 55.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.22
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89058
Primary art unit
3747
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
681
Granted applications
376
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5958
Supervisor
Lindsay Low
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1196

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 54 72.3% 1.66
Group 444 57.6% 1.86
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.38 1,618 office actions across 681 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 677 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.6%
1 OA 217 31.9%
2 OAs 257 37.7%
3 OAs 75 11.0%
4 OAs 55 8.1%
5+ OAs 73 10.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 71.4% 2012 2013: 40.0% 2013 2014: 43.8% 2014 2015: 29.6% 2015 2016: 30.2% 2016 2017: 43.8% 2017 2018: 68.6% 2018 2019: 58.6% 2019 2020: 73.0% 2020 2021: 73.8% 2021 2022: 81.4% 2022 2023: 66.1% 2023 2024: 78.0% 2024 2025: 45.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20127571.4%
2013301240.0%
2014321443.8%
201527829.6%
2016431330.2%
2017482143.8%
2018513568.6%
2019583458.6%
2020634673.0%
2021614573.8%
2022594881.4%
2023563766.1%
2024503978.0%
2025421945.2%
20265400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 677 1.0% 13.1% 68.1% 16.0%
Action 2 460 0.7% 11.3% 76.1% 11.5%
Action 3 203 0.0% 8.9% 82.3% 7.9%
Action 4 128 0.0% 8.6% 85.2% 5.5%
Action 5 73 0.0% 1.4% 90.4% 8.2%
Action 6 38 0.0% 2.6% 92.1% 5.3%
Action 7 17 0.0% 5.9% 88.2% 5.9%
Action 8 10 0.0% 10.0% 70.0% 20.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.3% 4 of 299 office actions
All years 0.6% 10 of 1,618 office actions
Change +0.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.9%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.8%
0.9%
0.8%
0.9%
2024: AI examples
2.9%
2025: August memo
0.0%
1.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 24, 2019 13/140,948 Reversed §103
Dec. 17, 2018 13/891,616 Affirmed §101
Sep. 26, 2018 13/843,686 Reversed §102
Aug. 29, 2018 13/480,118 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Nov. 15, 2017 13/062,616 Affirmed §103
Sep. 28, 2017 13/170,241 Reversed §103
Sep. 28, 2017 13/004,386 Affirmed §103
Jun. 30, 2017 13/181,981 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.