Examiner Susan E Scharpf

Grant ratio: 75.4% (61st percentile in Art Unit 3747 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.82. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 75.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.82
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91262
Primary art unit
3747
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
386
Granted applications
291
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5304
Supervisor
Pat Wongwian
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5426

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 54 72.3% 1.66
Group 444 57.6% 1.86
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.85 715 office actions across 386 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 385 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.3%
1 OA 170 44.0%
2 OAs 148 38.3%
3 OAs 39 10.1%
4 OAs 17 4.4%
5+ OAs 11 2.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 55.6% 2014 2015: 78.6% 2015 2016: 78.9% 2016 2017: 78.6% 2017 2018: 75.8% 2018 2019: 81.0% 2019 2020: 83.3% 2020 2021: 73.7% 2021 2022: 90.3% 2022 2023: 91.2% 2023 2024: 82.1% 2024 2025: 56.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20149555.6%
2015282278.6%
2016383078.9%
2017282278.6%
2018332575.8%
2019423481.0%
2020363083.3%
2021382873.7%
2022312890.3%
2023343191.2%
2024282382.1%
2025231356.5%
20261800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 385 3.9% 13.2% 60.3% 20.0%
Action 2 215 2.8% 16.3% 63.7% 15.8%
Action 3 67 6.0% 11.9% 62.7% 19.4%
Action 4 28 3.6% 14.3% 67.9% 14.3%
Action 5 11 0.0% 0.0% 72.7% 27.3%
Action 6 6 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 16.7%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 16.5% 19 of 115 office actions
All years 3.6% 26 of 715 office actions
Change +12.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
2.2%
1.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
2.4%
8.5%
2024: AI examples
23.1%
2025: August memo
12.8%
9.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
71.4% 5/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 7, 2021 15/697,916 Affirmed §102 · §103
Nov. 27, 2018 14/742,901 Reversed §103
Sep. 18, 2018 14/061,101 Affirmed in part §103
May. 31, 2018 14/132,913 Affirmed §103
Dec. 4, 2017 13/591,764 Reversed §103 · §112
Oct. 23, 2017 13/792,535 Reversed §103
Jun. 26, 2017 13/609,694 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.