Examiner George R. Blum

Grant ratio: 16.2% (2nd percentile in Art Unit 3749 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.63. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2025
Grant ratio 16.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.63
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
75022
Primary art unit
3749
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
117
Granted applications
19

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 34 49.5% 2.05
Group 443 57.4% 1.86
Tech Center 2,685 47.8% 2.01
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.21 258 office actions across 117 applications
Applications with office actions 99.1% 116 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.9%
1 OA 52 44.4%
2 OAs 30 25.6%
3 OAs 13 11.1%
4 OAs 12 10.3%
5+ OAs 9 7.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 50.0% 2009 2010: 15.4% 2010 2011: 0.0% 2011 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 0.0% 2013 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 33.3% 2016 2017: 0.0% 2017 2019: 100.0% 2019 2020: 25.0% 2020 2021: 0.0% 2021 2022: 42.9% 2022 2023: 40.0% 2023 2024: 75.0% 2024 2025: 0.0% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008100.0%
20094250.0%
201013215.4%
20112400.0%
2012200.0%
2013100.0%
2015100.0%
201615533.3%
20172200.0%
201911100.0%
20204125.0%
20211200.0%
20227342.9%
20235240.0%
20244375.0%
2025100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 116 0.0% 6.0% 91.4% 0.0%
Action 2 64 0.0% 6.3% 92.2% 1.6%
Action 3 34 0.0% 2.9% 97.1% 0.0%
Action 4 21 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 9 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 258 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 24, 2018 13/227,405 Affirmed §112
May. 25, 2018 12/744,677 Reversed §103
May. 23, 2018 13/417,133 Reversed §103
Feb. 13, 2018 13/859,020 Affirmed in part §103
Jun. 27, 2013 10/864,156 Affirmed §103
Sep. 27, 2012 11/764,596 Affirmed §103
Jul. 13, 2012 11/528,710 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.