Examiner Samantha Miller

Grant ratio: 46.5% (43rd percentile in Art Unit 3749 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.60. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2019
Grant ratio 46.5%
Average office actions / grant 3.60
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82581
Primary art unit
3749
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
565
Granted applications
263

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 34 49.6% 2.05
Group 444 57.6% 1.86
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.09 1,838 office actions across 595 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 595 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 133 22.4%
2 OAs 171 28.7%
3 OAs 87 14.6%
4 OAs 87 14.6%
5+ OAs 117 19.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 24.4% 2008 2009: 15.1% 2009 2010: 34.5% 2010 2011: 34.0% 2011 2012: 28.6% 2012 2013: 48.3% 2013 2014: 35.6% 2014 2015: 40.0% 2015 2016: 61.2% 2016 2017: 75.9% 2017 2018: 77.5% 2018 2019: 72.4% 2019

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008411024.4%
200953815.1%
2010551934.5%
2011531834.0%
2012421228.6%
2013291448.3%
2014451635.6%
2015401640.0%
2016493061.2%
2017584475.9%
2018715577.5%
2019292172.4%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 595 0.3% 25.0% 70.4% 2.7%
Action 2 462 0.2% 18.4% 76.0% 4.1%
Action 3 291 0.3% 12.7% 79.0% 6.5%
Action 4 204 0.0% 10.8% 78.4% 9.3%
Action 5 117 0.9% 7.7% 78.6% 12.0%
Action 6 78 0.0% 7.7% 83.3% 6.4%
Action 7 48 0.0% 2.1% 93.8% 2.1%
Action 8 31 0.0% 9.7% 64.5% 19.4%
Action 9 8 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 75.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 5 of 1,838 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.7%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 8/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
83.3% 10/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 21, 2018 11/980,850 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 20, 2018 12/582,773 Reversed §103
Jun. 19, 2018 11/526,215 Reversed §103
Mar. 19, 2018 11/746,279 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 22, 2018 12/711,645 Reversed §103
Sep. 27, 2017 12/850,889 Reversed §103
Apr. 25, 2017 11/625,764 Reversed §103
Aug. 3, 2016 10/664,865 Reversed §103
Sep. 17, 2013 11/163,918 Affirmed in part §102 · §112
Aug. 28, 2013 11/362,774 Affirmed §101 · §103
Jul. 31, 2013 11/335,874 Reversed §102 · §103
Apr. 6, 2011 11/031,805 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.