Examiner Daniel E. Namay

Grant ratio: 65.2% (91st percentile in Art Unit 3749 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.66. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2024
Grant ratio 65.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.66
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85648
Primary art unit
3749
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
767
Granted applications
500

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 34 49.6% 2.05
Group 444 57.6% 1.86
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.72 1,343 office actions across 781 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 781 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 425 54.4%
2 OAs 239 30.6%
3 OAs 67 8.6%
4 OAs 29 3.7%
5+ OAs 21 2.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 25.0% 2008 2009: 52.2% 2009 2010: 59.5% 2010 2011: 44.9% 2011 2012: 51.9% 2012 2013: 41.5% 2013 2014: 60.3% 2014 2015: 65.0% 2015 2016: 70.7% 2016 2017: 69.2% 2017 2018: 71.0% 2018 2019: 73.1% 2019 2020: 81.3% 2020 2021: 74.4% 2021 2022: 75.6% 2022 2023: 82.6% 2023 2024: 50.0% 2024

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20084125.0%
2009462452.2%
2010422559.5%
2011492244.9%
2012522751.9%
2013411741.5%
2014583560.3%
2015402665.0%
2016584170.7%
2017654569.2%
2018624471.0%
2019523873.1%
2020645281.3%
2021433274.4%
2022413175.6%
2023463882.6%
20244250.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 781 0.4% 6.5% 86.6% 2.2%
Action 2 356 0.3% 5.6% 89.9% 3.1%
Action 3 117 0.0% 5.1% 88.0% 5.1%
Action 4 50 0.0% 4.0% 96.0% 0.0%
Action 5 21 0.0% 4.8% 85.7% 4.8%
Action 6 10 0.0% 10.0% 90.0% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 33 office actions
All years 0.3% 4 of 1,343 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 6/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 26, 2019 14/338,468 Reversed §103
Apr. 10, 2019 12/742,189 Reversed §103
Feb. 12, 2018 13/090,837 Affirmed §103
Oct. 30, 2017 11/020,617 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 12, 2016 13/859,576 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jan. 27, 2015 11/909,823 Reversed N/A
Oct. 30, 2013 11/358,468 Affirmed in part §103
Nov. 13, 2012 10/943,517 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.