Examiner Khoa D. Huynh

Grant ratio: 24.9% (17th percentile in Art Unit 3751 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.35. Most common rejection type: §103.

Potentially inactive Last office action in data: May 2026
Grant ratio 24.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.35
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
76670
Primary art unit
3751
Work group
3750
Technology center
3700
Applications
197
Granted applications
49

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 12 29.6% 1.55
Group 162 53.4% 1.75
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.37 269 office actions across 197 applications
Applications with office actions 86.8% 171 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 26 13.2%
1 OA 111 56.3%
2 OAs 43 21.8%
3 OAs 4 2.0%
4 OAs 10 5.1%
5+ OAs 3 1.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 66.7% 2008 2009: 39.5% 2009 2010: 45.1% 2010 2011: 50.0% 2011 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 33.3% 2015 2016: 75.0% 2016 2020: 0.0% 2020 2021: 0.0% 2021 2024: 0.0% 2024 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20089666.7%
2009381539.5%
2010512345.1%
20112150.0%
20121300.0%
2013100.0%
2014200.0%
20153133.3%
20164375.0%
2020500.0%
20214800.0%
2024200.0%
2025300.0%
20261600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 171 0.6% 18.1% 77.8% 1.8%
Action 2 60 0.0% 5.0% 90.0% 5.0%
Action 3 17 0.0% 0.0% 94.1% 5.9%
Action 4 13 0.0% 0.0% 92.3% 0.0%
Action 5 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 6 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 27 office actions
All years 0.4% 1 of 269 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 25, 2019 14/179,956 Reversed §103 · §112
Feb. 13, 2019 13/831,876 Reversed N/A
Jul. 26, 2018 13/655,548 Reversed §112
Oct. 23, 2017 13/206,296 Affirmed §103
Jul. 31, 2017 12/931,146 Affirmed §103
Sep. 25, 2013 11/951,684 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.