Examiner Tuongminh Nguyen Pham

Grant ratio: 58.6% (59th percentile in Art Unit 3752 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.34. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 58.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.34
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91617
Primary art unit
3752
Work group
3750
Technology center
3700
Applications
541
Granted applications
317
Examiner phone
(571) 270-0158
Supervisor
Arthur Hall
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1814

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 47.0% 1.98
Group 162 53.4% 1.75
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.16 1,166 office actions across 541 applications
Applications with office actions 98.0% 530 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 11 2.0%
1 OA 220 40.7%
2 OAs 148 27.4%
3 OAs 62 11.5%
4 OAs 62 11.5%
5+ OAs 38 7.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 100.0% 2011 2014: 30.0% 2014 2015: 48.6% 2015 2016: 51.2% 2016 2017: 57.1% 2017 2018: 72.5% 2018 2019: 65.9% 2019 2020: 77.2% 2020 2021: 66.7% 2021 2022: 80.4% 2022 2023: 84.2% 2023 2024: 69.7% 2024 2025: 43.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201111100.0%
201410330.0%
2015351748.6%
2016412151.2%
2017492857.1%
2018402972.5%
2019442965.9%
2020574477.2%
2021453066.7%
2022463780.4%
2023383284.2%
2024332369.7%
2025532343.4%
20264900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 530 0.6% 7.5% 71.9% 12.8%
Action 2 310 0.0% 7.1% 78.7% 9.4%
Action 3 162 0.0% 2.5% 85.8% 9.9%
Action 4 100 0.0% 3.0% 85.0% 10.0%
Action 5 38 0.0% 2.6% 81.6% 15.8%
Action 6 16 0.0% 0.0% 68.8% 31.3%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 228 office actions
All years 0.3% 3 of 1,166 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
83.3% 5/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
7.0 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 19, 2026 17/346,839 Affirmed §103
Mar. 7, 2023 17/533,647 Reversed §103
Oct. 28, 2021 15/105,308 Reversed §103
Nov. 7, 2019 14/376,208 Reversed §103
Sep. 24, 2018 14/338,761 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Dec. 20, 2017 13/744,409 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.