Examiner Minh Le

Grant ratio: 74.4% (84th percentile in Art Unit 3753 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.52. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 74.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.52
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87977
Primary art unit
3753
Work group
3750
Technology center
3700
Applications
777
Granted applications
578
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3805

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 64 61.0% 1.70
Group 162 53.4% 1.75
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.56 1,209 office actions across 777 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 777 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 496 63.8%
2 OAs 198 25.5%
3 OAs 47 6.0%
4 OAs 20 2.6%
5+ OAs 16 2.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 67.6% 2011 2012: 71.4% 2012 2013: 79.1% 2013 2014: 79.2% 2014 2015: 75.6% 2015 2016: 75.0% 2016 2017: 76.5% 2017 2018: 74.0% 2018 2019: 83.3% 2019 2020: 87.0% 2020 2021: 93.0% 2021 2022: 89.7% 2022 2023: 87.5% 2023 2024: 89.5% 2024 2025: 35.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011342367.6%
2012705071.4%
2013433479.1%
2014534279.2%
2015453475.6%
2016523975.0%
2017685276.5%
2018503774.0%
2019665583.3%
2020544787.0%
2021434093.0%
2022393589.7%
2023484287.5%
2024383489.5%
2025391435.9%
20263500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 777 0.3% 21.0% 61.8% 14.7%
Action 2 281 0.0% 18.5% 73.0% 7.5%
Action 3 83 0.0% 7.2% 90.4% 1.2%
Action 4 36 0.0% 13.9% 80.6% 5.6%
Action 5 16 0.0% 6.3% 93.8% 0.0%
Action 6 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.6% 1 of 155 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 1,209 office actions
Change +0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
2.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 3/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.1 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 31, 2024 15/911,775 Affirmed §103
Mar. 26, 2018 13/261,433 Reversed §103
Jan. 19, 2018 13/851,656 Reversed §103
Feb. 24, 2017 12/282,797 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.