Examiner David Walczak

Grant ratio: 71.3% (80th percentile in Art Unit 3754 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.41. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 71.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.41
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
68780
Primary art unit
3754
Work group
3750
Technology center
3700
Applications
1,773
Granted applications
1,265
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4895
Supervisor
David Angwin
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3735

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 51 53.9% 1.69
Group 162 53.4% 1.75
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.38 2,455 office actions across 1,773 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 1,769 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.2%
1 OA 1,255 70.8%
2 OAs 402 22.7%
3 OAs 73 4.1%
4 OAs 29 1.6%
5+ OAs 10 0.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 61.4% 2008 2009: 68.6% 2009 2010: 72.4% 2010 2011: 55.0% 2011 2012: 63.6% 2012 2013: 73.2% 2013 2014: 74.0% 2014 2015: 67.7% 2015 2016: 87.4% 2016 2017: 81.7% 2017 2018: 80.6% 2018 2019: 77.2% 2019 2020: 79.8% 2020 2021: 78.3% 2021 2022: 80.7% 2022 2023: 84.3% 2023 2024: 85.9% 2024 2025: 55.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20081147061.4%
20091027068.6%
20101279272.4%
20111116155.0%
2012996363.6%
2013826073.2%
20141007474.0%
2015936367.7%
2016877687.4%
20171048581.7%
2018937580.6%
2019927177.2%
2020947579.8%
2021927278.3%
2022887180.7%
2023837084.3%
2024857385.9%
2025804455.0%
20264700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,769 0.5% 8.7% 59.1% 28.9%
Action 2 514 0.0% 8.8% 62.8% 22.2%
Action 3 112 0.0% 7.1% 75.0% 17.0%
Action 4 39 0.0% 5.1% 64.1% 25.6%
Action 5 10 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 10.0%
Action 6 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 282 office actions
All years 0.3% 8 of 2,455 office actions
Change +0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.5%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.9%
1.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 21, 2017 14/067,459 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.