Examiner L Baker

Grant ratio: 76.7% (92nd percentile in Art Unit 3754 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.36. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 76.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.36
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
76797
Primary art unit
3754
Work group
3750
Technology center
3700
Applications
1,699
Granted applications
1,303
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4971
Supervisor
David Angwin
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3538

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 51 53.9% 1.69
Group 162 53.4% 1.75
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.37 2,322 office actions across 1,699 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 1,696 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.2%
1 OA 1,283 75.5%
2 OAs 289 17.0%
3 OAs 76 4.5%
4 OAs 30 1.8%
5+ OAs 18 1.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 100.0% 2007 2008: 59.2% 2008 2009: 71.2% 2009 2010: 77.3% 2010 2011: 65.3% 2011 2012: 78.5% 2012 2013: 64.1% 2013 2014: 75.0% 2014 2015: 86.7% 2015 2016: 82.1% 2016 2017: 80.2% 2017 2018: 89.7% 2018 2019: 84.3% 2019 2020: 82.4% 2020 2021: 90.5% 2021 2022: 88.6% 2022 2023: 88.6% 2023 2024: 84.3% 2024 2025: 56.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200711100.0%
2008764559.2%
20091188471.2%
201013210277.3%
20111016665.3%
20121078478.5%
2013925964.1%
2014886675.0%
2015907886.7%
20161129282.1%
20171118980.2%
20181079689.7%
2019897584.3%
2020857082.4%
2021746790.5%
2022797088.6%
2023706288.6%
2024705984.3%
2025673856.7%
20263000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,696 0.6% 8.8% 54.4% 7.8%
Action 2 413 0.0% 4.8% 70.5% 7.0%
Action 3 124 0.0% 3.2% 75.8% 6.5%
Action 4 48 0.0% 2.1% 77.1% 10.4%
Action 5 18 0.0% 5.6% 72.2% 22.2%
Action 6 9 0.0% 0.0% 77.8% 11.1%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.0% 2 of 197 office actions
All years 0.5% 11 of 2,322 office actions
Change +0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.0%
1.3%
0.0%
1.4%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
6.7%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 13. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
30.8% 4/13 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
61.5% 8/13 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 15, 2016 12/166,583 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Dec. 29, 2015 11/406,456 Affirmed §100 · §103 · §112
Aug. 26, 2015 11/494,428 Reversed §103
Jun. 15, 2015 12/100,497 Reversed N/A
Jan. 29, 2015 11/670,117 Reversed N/A
Jan. 22, 2015 11/443,605 Affirmed in part N/A
Aug. 15, 2014 11/003,639 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Nov. 18, 2013 11/020,868 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 25, 2013 12/056,485 Affirmed in part N/A
Jun. 12, 2013 11/724,226 Affirmed in part N/A
Apr. 30, 2013 11/355,227 Affirmed §103 · §112
Feb. 27, 2013 11/193,195 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.