Examiner Daniel R. Shearer

Grant ratio: 42.9% (15th percentile in Art Unit 3754 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.53. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2016
Grant ratio 42.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.53
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85807
Primary art unit
3754
Work group
3750
Technology center
3700
Applications
417
Granted applications
179

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 51 53.9% 1.69
Group 162 53.4% 1.75
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.31 962 office actions across 417 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 417 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 160 38.4%
2 OAs 133 31.9%
3 OAs 41 9.8%
4 OAs 46 11.0%
5+ OAs 37 8.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 32.3% 2009 2010: 50.0% 2010 2011: 32.3% 2011 2012: 46.9% 2012 2013: 40.3% 2013 2014: 42.2% 2014 2015: 63.5% 2015 2016: 50.0% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008200.0%
2009622032.3%
2010442250.0%
2011652132.3%
2012643046.9%
2013622540.3%
2014642742.2%
2015523363.5%
20162150.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 417 0.0% 9.1% 84.9% 5.8%
Action 2 257 0.0% 11.3% 79.8% 8.6%
Action 3 124 0.0% 6.5% 83.1% 10.5%
Action 4 83 0.0% 2.4% 88.0% 9.6%
Action 5 37 0.0% 8.1% 81.1% 5.4%
Action 6 22 0.0% 0.0% 90.9% 9.1%
Action 7 8 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 962 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 17. Merits outcomes: 11 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
17.6% 3/17 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
35.3% 6/17 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 18, 2015 12/880,588 Reversed N/A
Feb. 26, 2015 11/611,117 Affirmed §102
Nov. 14, 2014 11/599,496 Affirmed §103
Sep. 26, 2014 12/887,378 Affirmed §103
Sep. 26, 2014 11/626,790 Affirmed §103 · §112
Oct. 30, 2013 11/906,229 Reversed §102 · §103
Oct. 28, 2013 11/685,874 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 27, 2013 11/566,830 Affirmed in part N/A
Aug. 27, 2013 11/490,817 Affirmed §103
May. 31, 2013 11/728,469 Affirmed §103
Apr. 25, 2013 11/485,887 Affirmed in part N/A
Apr. 24, 2013 11/542,172 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.