Examiner Lauren Crane

Grant ratio: 53.4% (30th percentile in Art Unit 3754 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.16. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 53.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.16
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86963
Primary art unit
3754
Work group
3750
Technology center
3700
Applications
877
Granted applications
468
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5198
Supervisor
David Angwin
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3735

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 51 53.9% 1.69
Group 162 53.4% 1.75
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.01 1,763 office actions across 877 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 875 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.2%
1 OA 408 46.5%
2 OAs 259 29.5%
3 OAs 94 10.7%
4 OAs 64 7.3%
5+ OAs 50 5.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 18.2% 2009 2010: 32.8% 2010 2011: 29.0% 2011 2012: 27.3% 2012 2013: 29.2% 2013 2014: 45.1% 2014 2015: 55.6% 2015 2016: 54.5% 2016 2017: 69.9% 2017 2018: 69.5% 2018 2019: 75.7% 2019 2020: 87.5% 2020 2021: 85.0% 2021 2022: 82.4% 2022 2023: 80.0% 2023 2024: 80.6% 2024 2025: 39.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200911218.2%
2010581932.8%
2011621829.0%
2012441227.3%
2013481429.2%
2014713245.1%
2015633555.6%
2016884854.5%
2017735169.9%
2018825769.5%
2019745675.7%
2020403587.5%
2021201785.0%
2022171482.4%
2023252080.0%
2024312580.6%
2025331339.4%
20263700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 875 0.1% 15.8% 75.8% 3.4%
Action 2 467 0.0% 7.3% 82.7% 4.3%
Action 3 208 0.0% 2.9% 89.4% 5.3%
Action 4 114 0.0% 1.8% 90.4% 7.9%
Action 5 50 0.0% 4.0% 90.0% 6.0%
Action 6 27 0.0% 0.0% 85.2% 14.8%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 147 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 1,763 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 15. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 6 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
13.3% 2/15 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
53.3% 8/15 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.6 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 20, 2018 13/275,359 Affirmed in part §103
Mar. 27, 2018 13/779,026 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jan. 23, 2018 13/238,782 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Nov. 29, 2017 11/618,636 Affirmed in part §103
Aug. 23, 2017 12/785,857 Affirmed §103
Jun. 23, 2017 12/986,341 Affirmed §100 · §103 · §112
Feb. 28, 2017 13/141,409 Affirmed in part §103
Jan. 27, 2017 13/683,149 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 13, 2016 12/529,149 Affirmed §103 · §112
Nov. 23, 2016 12/034,934 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Mar. 26, 2015 12/032,844 Affirmed in part N/A
Mar. 16, 2015 11/613,562 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.