Examiner Jacqueline Stephens

Grant ratio: 71.2% (93rd percentile in Art Unit 3761 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.90. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 71.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.90
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78249
Primary art unit
3761
Work group
3760
Technology center
3700
Applications
1,423
Granted applications
1,013
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4937
Supervisor
Nicholas Weiss
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1775

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 87 36.6% 2.17
Group 384 48.9% 2.11
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.87 2,663 office actions across 1,423 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 1,415 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 0.6%
1 OA 703 49.4%
2 OAs 448 31.5%
3 OAs 123 8.6%
4 OAs 74 5.2%
5+ OAs 67 4.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 61.0% 2008 2009: 71.4% 2009 2010: 78.6% 2010 2011: 86.2% 2011 2012: 65.6% 2012 2013: 80.5% 2013 2014: 86.5% 2014 2015: 80.9% 2015 2016: 87.5% 2016 2017: 75.8% 2017 2018: 76.3% 2018 2019: 73.8% 2019 2020: 72.1% 2020 2021: 92.9% 2021 2022: 73.1% 2022 2023: 78.9% 2023 2024: 65.5% 2024 2025: 30.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20081006161.0%
2009916571.4%
20101128878.6%
2011877586.2%
2012905965.6%
2013877080.5%
2014746486.5%
2015685580.9%
2016726387.5%
2017665075.8%
2018806176.3%
2019654873.8%
2020684972.1%
2021565292.9%
2022523873.1%
2023715678.9%
2024583865.5%
2025692130.4%
20265700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,415 0.4% 11.4% 71.4% 1.5%
Action 2 712 0.3% 8.8% 79.2% 1.7%
Action 3 264 0.4% 6.4% 82.2% 1.1%
Action 4 141 0.0% 5.7% 84.4% 2.1%
Action 5 67 0.0% 6.0% 80.6% 0.0%
Action 6 36 0.0% 0.0% 86.1% 2.8%
Action 7 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 324 office actions
All years 0.3% 9 of 2,663 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.8%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 40. Merits outcomes: 13 affirmed, 5 affirmed in part, and 22 reversed.

Full reversal rate
55.0% 22/40 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
67.5% 27/40 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.1 months
New grounds of rejection
4
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 27, 2026 18/457,526 Reversed N/A
Jun. 3, 2022 15/805,508 Reversed §103
Mar. 29, 2018 13/832,965 Reversed §103
Mar. 8, 2018 12/654,241 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Dec. 21, 2016 13/481,366 Affirmed §103
Jun. 27, 2016 12/514,911 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Apr. 26, 2016 12/491,701 Reversed §102
Mar. 1, 2013 11/185,889 Reversed N/A
Feb. 27, 2013 10/879,776 Reversed §103
Nov. 29, 2012 11/283,174 Affirmed New ground of rejection §101 · §103
Nov. 7, 2012 11/182,303 Affirmed §103
Sep. 26, 2012 11/214,401 Affirmed in part §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.