Examiner James Sims

Grant ratio: 74.9% (96th percentile in Art Unit 3761 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.98. Most common rejection type: §103.

Potentially inactive Last office action in data: April 2026
Grant ratio 74.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.98
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88759
Primary art unit
3761
Work group
3760
Technology center
3700
Applications
478
Granted applications
358

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 87 36.6% 2.17
Group 384 48.9% 2.11
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.95 933 office actions across 478 applications
Applications with office actions 98.3% 470 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 1.7%
1 OA 225 47.1%
2 OAs 139 29.1%
3 OAs 51 10.7%
4 OAs 26 5.4%
5+ OAs 29 6.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 71.4% 2012 2013: 48.4% 2013 2014: 68.6% 2014 2015: 60.0% 2015 2016: 72.4% 2016 2017: 65.5% 2017 2018: 84.8% 2018 2019: 88.4% 2019 2020: 96.6% 2020 2021: 81.8% 2021 2022: 82.7% 2022 2023: 89.1% 2023 2024: 82.7% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20127571.4%
2013311548.4%
2014352468.6%
2015301860.0%
2016292172.4%
2017291965.5%
2018332884.8%
2019433888.4%
2020292896.6%
2021221881.8%
2022524382.7%
2023464189.1%
2024524382.7%
2025341750.0%
2026600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 470 0.2% 4.5% 63.6% 26.0%
Action 2 245 0.8% 12.2% 65.7% 19.6%
Action 3 106 0.9% 6.6% 74.5% 17.0%
Action 4 55 0.0% 10.9% 61.8% 25.5%
Action 5 29 0.0% 3.4% 79.3% 13.8%
Action 6 18 0.0% 5.6% 77.8% 16.7%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 66.7%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.7% 1 of 137 office actions
All years 0.4% 4 of 933 office actions
Change +0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
1.2%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 5 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
88.9% 8/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.2 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 20, 2025 17/142,232 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Jul. 8, 2022 15/864,687 Affirmed §102
Apr. 20, 2018 12/220,585 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Dec. 12, 2017 12/998,250 Reversed §103 · §112
Nov. 8, 2017 12/946,748 Reversed §103
Aug. 14, 2017 13/253,231 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Mar. 21, 2017 13/432,123 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Sep. 28, 2016 12/513,703 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Aug. 9, 2016 13/306,946 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.