Examiner John J. Norton

Grant ratio: 58.2% (72nd percentile in Art Unit 3761 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.25. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 58.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.25
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89683
Primary art unit
3761
Work group
3760
Technology center
3700
Applications
737
Granted applications
429
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5174
Supervisor
Edward F. Landrum
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8648

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 87 36.6% 2.17
Group 384 48.9% 2.11
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.16 1,591 office actions across 737 applications
Applications with office actions 96.9% 714 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 23 3.1%
1 OA 305 41.4%
2 OAs 210 28.5%
3 OAs 75 10.2%
4 OAs 67 9.1%
5+ OAs 57 7.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 100.0% 2012 2013: 36.6% 2013 2014: 59.5% 2014 2015: 45.2% 2015 2016: 55.9% 2016 2017: 69.8% 2017 2018: 53.2% 2018 2019: 71.7% 2019 2020: 69.0% 2020 2021: 75.0% 2021 2022: 83.3% 2022 2023: 76.5% 2023 2024: 83.9% 2024 2025: 36.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201222100.0%
2013411536.6%
2014422559.5%
2015421945.2%
2016341955.9%
2017533769.8%
2018472553.2%
2019533871.7%
2020584069.0%
2021725475.0%
2022544583.3%
2023513976.5%
2024564783.9%
2025662436.4%
20266600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 714 0.7% 5.3% 66.2% 20.3%
Action 2 409 0.5% 4.9% 74.3% 15.9%
Action 3 199 0.5% 1.5% 76.9% 15.1%
Action 4 124 0.8% 4.0% 71.8% 21.0%
Action 5 57 0.0% 5.3% 82.5% 8.8%
Action 6 39 0.0% 2.6% 84.6% 10.3%
Action 7 17 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 16 0.0% 0.0% 93.8% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.2% 4 of 324 office actions
All years 0.6% 9 of 1,591 office actions
Change +0.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.9%
2.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 30, 2024 15/349,619 Affirmed §103
May. 15, 2023 14/910,399 Affirmed §103
Oct. 21, 2019 14/384,452 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Nov. 14, 2017 14/101,581 Affirmed §102 · §103
Oct. 13, 2017 13/440,623 Affirmed §102 · §103
Aug. 31, 2017 13/120,612 Reversed §103
May. 9, 2017 13/178,168 Affirmed in part §103
Feb. 28, 2017 12/846,559 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.