Examiner Spencer H Kirkwood

Grant ratio: 41.0% (39th percentile in Art Unit 3761 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.79. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 41.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.79
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
92956
Primary art unit
3761
Work group
3760
Technology center
3700
Applications
288
Granted applications
118
Examiner phone
(469) 295-9113
Supervisor
Steven Crabb
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5095

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 87 36.6% 2.17
Group 384 48.9% 2.11
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.65 762 office actions across 288 applications
Applications with office actions 96.9% 279 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 9 3.1%
1 OA 80 27.8%
2 OAs 86 29.9%
3 OAs 39 13.5%
4 OAs 35 12.2%
5+ OAs 39 13.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016: 0.0% 2016 2017: 35.7% 2017 2018: 53.8% 2018 2019: 48.3% 2019 2020: 57.6% 2020 2021: 55.0% 2021 2022: 57.9% 2022 2023: 77.8% 2023 2024: 41.7% 2024 2025: 21.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20161200.0%
2017421535.7%
2018261453.8%
2019291448.3%
2020331957.6%
2021201155.0%
2022191157.9%
2023272177.8%
2024241041.7%
202514321.4%
20264200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 279 0.4% 5.4% 92.1% 1.4%
Action 2 199 0.0% 1.5% 94.0% 1.5%
Action 3 113 0.0% 1.8% 94.7% 0.9%
Action 4 74 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 39 0.0% 0.0% 94.9% 2.6%
Action 6 28 0.0% 0.0% 92.9% 7.1%
Action 7 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 10 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 10.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.5% 1 of 188 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 762 office actions
Change +0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.6%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 25, 2025 16/778,047 Affirmed §103 · §112
May. 15, 2023 15/446,139 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Sep. 17, 2020 14/782,886 Affirmed §103
Jan. 2, 2020 14/378,815 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.