Examiner Minh Duc Pham

Grant ratio: 62.5% (50th percentile in Art Unit 3762 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.79. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2021
Grant ratio 62.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.79
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88042
Primary art unit
3762
Work group
3760
Technology center
3700
Applications
280
Granted applications
175

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 59 58.2% 1.97
Group 384 48.9% 2.11
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.77 816 office actions across 295 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 295 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 86 29.2%
2 OAs 77 26.1%
3 OAs 50 16.9%
4 OAs 37 12.5%
5+ OAs 45 15.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 20.0% 2011 2012: 62.1% 2012 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 68.4% 2014 2015: 63.3% 2015 2016: 65.7% 2016 2017: 57.1% 2017 2018: 54.2% 2018 2019: 59.4% 2019 2020: 76.7% 2020 2021: 84.2% 2021

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20115120.0%
2012291862.1%
2013361850.0%
2014191368.4%
2015301963.3%
2016352365.7%
2017211257.1%
2018241354.2%
2019321959.4%
2020302376.7%
2021191684.2%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 295 0.0% 10.2% 88.8% 0.7%
Action 2 209 0.0% 17.7% 79.4% 2.9%
Action 3 132 0.0% 12.1% 84.8% 3.0%
Action 4 82 0.0% 8.5% 90.2% 1.2%
Action 5 45 2.2% 11.1% 84.4% 2.2%
Action 6 23 0.0% 21.7% 73.9% 4.3%
Action 7 13 0.0% 15.4% 84.6% 0.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 816 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 14. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 7/14 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
71.4% 10/14 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.8 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 10, 2021 15/365,319 Affirmed in part §103
Jun. 29, 2020 14/915,653 Reversed §103
Jun. 19, 2020 13/749,489 Reversed §103 · §112
May. 23, 2018 13/877,672 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jul. 10, 2017 12/410,233 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jun. 19, 2017 12/913,400 Affirmed §103
Oct. 13, 2016 12/860,106 Affirmed §102 · §103
Sep. 28, 2016 12/464,655 Affirmed §103
Aug. 26, 2016 12/550,213 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Mar. 28, 2016 12/182,691 Reversed New ground of rejection §101 · §103
Mar. 25, 2016 12/264,131 Reversed §103
Feb. 29, 2016 12/494,690 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.