Examiner John Mccormack

Grant ratio: 67.9% (63rd percentile in Art Unit 3762 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.81. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 67.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.81
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88089
Primary art unit
3762
Work group
3760
Technology center
3700
Applications
848
Granted applications
576
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7472
Supervisor
Edelmira Bosques
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5614

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 59 58.2% 1.97
Group 384 48.9% 2.11
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.85 1,572 office actions across 848 applications
Applications with office actions 99.1% 840 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 0.9%
1 OA 437 51.5%
2 OAs 235 27.7%
3 OAs 82 9.7%
4 OAs 47 5.5%
5+ OAs 39 4.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 29.4% 2011 2012: 37.3% 2012 2013: 56.5% 2013 2014: 60.5% 2014 2015: 52.6% 2015 2016: 62.2% 2016 2017: 78.5% 2017 2018: 75.0% 2018 2019: 76.1% 2019 2020: 81.3% 2020 2021: 91.0% 2021 2022: 74.5% 2022 2023: 81.5% 2023 2024: 86.2% 2024 2025: 43.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201117529.4%
2012511937.3%
2013693956.5%
2014382360.5%
2015382052.6%
2016452862.2%
2017655178.5%
2018685175.0%
20191098376.1%
2020806581.3%
2021787191.0%
2022513874.5%
2023544481.5%
2024292586.2%
2025321443.8%
20262400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 840 0.7% 3.5% 81.5% 9.3%
Action 2 403 0.5% 2.7% 87.1% 7.9%
Action 3 168 0.6% 2.4% 90.5% 5.4%
Action 4 86 0.0% 0.0% 93.0% 7.0%
Action 5 39 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 21 0.0% 0.0% 95.2% 4.8%
Action 7 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 141 office actions
All years 0.6% 9 of 1,572 office actions
Change -0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2.0%
0.9%
0.0%
1.0%
2019: PEG
1.3%
0.9%
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 18, 2021 14/424,611 Affirmed §103
Jan. 24, 2017 12/094,086 Reversed §103
Jun. 30, 2016 12/297,903 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
May. 4, 2016 12/746,188 Affirmed §102 · §103
Dec. 14, 2015 12/491,315 Reversed N/A
Jul. 24, 2015 12/309,995 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.