Examiner Aarti Bhatia Berdichevsky

Grant ratio: 79.6% (96th percentile in Art Unit 3763 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.86. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: April 2018
Grant ratio 79.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.86
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84343
Primary art unit
3763
Work group
3760
Technology center
3700
Applications
651
Granted applications
518

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 99 54.0% 2.10
Group 384 48.9% 2.11
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.81 1,238 office actions across 685 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 685 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 382 55.8%
2 OAs 178 26.0%
3 OAs 55 8.0%
4 OAs 39 5.7%
5+ OAs 31 4.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 100.0% 2007 2008: 41.0% 2008 2009: 82.6% 2009 2010: 57.4% 2010 2011: 86.3% 2011 2012: 78.3% 2012 2013: 90.0% 2013 2014: 87.9% 2014 2015: 82.1% 2015 2016: 94.4% 2016 2017: 83.3% 2017 2018: 75.0% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200799100.0%
2008612541.0%
2009463882.6%
2010472757.4%
2011736386.3%
2012695478.3%
2013807290.0%
2014665887.9%
2015675582.1%
2016716794.4%
2017423583.3%
2018201575.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 685 0.3% 13.3% 70.9% 6.4%
Action 2 303 0.7% 9.9% 80.2% 5.0%
Action 3 125 0.0% 4.0% 87.2% 6.4%
Action 4 70 0.0% 7.1% 82.9% 7.1%
Action 5 31 0.0% 3.2% 87.1% 6.5%
Action 6 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 4 of 1,238 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.8%
1.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
87.5% 7/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 28, 2018 13/672,496 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 27, 2017 13/415,644 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Nov. 7, 2016 12/681,731 Affirmed §103
Nov. 30, 2015 12/332,025 Reversed N/A
Nov. 16, 2015 12/526,091 Reversed N/A
Oct. 16, 2012 11/646,744 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 28, 2012 11/294,256 Affirmed in part §103
Feb. 17, 2012 11/020,540 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.