Examiner Shaun R. Hurley

Grant ratio: 75.1% (87th percentile in Art Unit 3765 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.34. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 75.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.34
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78172
Primary art unit
3765
Work group
3760
Technology center
3700
Applications
1,701
Granted applications
1,277
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4986
Supervisor
Clinton T Ostrup
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-5559

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 47.5% 1.96
Group 384 48.9% 2.11
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.36 2,306 office actions across 1,701 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 1,697 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.2%
1 OA 1,220 71.7%
2 OAs 388 22.8%
3 OAs 58 3.4%
4 OAs 21 1.2%
5+ OAs 10 0.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 67.4% 2008 2009: 73.0% 2009 2010: 80.0% 2010 2011: 74.8% 2011 2012: 82.8% 2012 2013: 89.5% 2013 2014: 87.1% 2014 2015: 74.0% 2015 2016: 76.8% 2016 2017: 81.4% 2017 2018: 79.5% 2018 2019: 81.5% 2019 2020: 70.8% 2020 2021: 79.0% 2021 2022: 79.3% 2022 2023: 84.3% 2023 2024: 73.0% 2024 2025: 47.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008926267.4%
20091158473.0%
20101008080.0%
20111037774.8%
2012998282.8%
20131059489.5%
2014857487.1%
2015967174.0%
2016826376.8%
2017867081.4%
2018887079.5%
2019816681.5%
2020896370.8%
2021816479.0%
2022876979.3%
2023897584.3%
20241007373.0%
2025854047.1%
20263800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,697 0.5% 16.7% 50.0% 13.0%
Action 2 477 0.0% 14.9% 50.5% 12.4%
Action 3 89 1.1% 14.6% 58.4% 6.7%
Action 4 31 0.0% 19.4% 64.5% 6.5%
Action 5 10 0.0% 30.0% 70.0% 10.0%
Action 6 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.9% 3 of 332 office actions
All years 0.4% 9 of 2,306 office actions
Change +0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.9%
0.8%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
2024: AI examples
0.7%
2025: August memo
1.9%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 30, 2012 10/970,820 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.