Examiner Richale Quinn

Grant ratio: 48.7% (39th percentile in Art Unit 3765 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.13. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 48.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.13
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81221
Primary art unit
3765
Work group
3760
Technology center
3700
Applications
928
Granted applications
452
Examiner phone
(571) 272-8689
Supervisor
Clinton Ostrup
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-5559

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 47.5% 1.96
Group 384 48.9% 2.11
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.98 1,839 office actions across 928 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 923 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 0.5%
1 OA 438 47.2%
2 OAs 265 28.6%
3 OAs 103 11.1%
4 OAs 73 7.9%
5+ OAs 44 4.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 19.0% 2008 2009: 45.0% 2009 2010: 42.1% 2010 2011: 26.9% 2011 2012: 44.2% 2012 2013: 59.6% 2013 2014: 55.3% 2014 2015: 48.1% 2015 2016: 62.3% 2016 2017: 48.9% 2017 2018: 68.6% 2018 2019: 57.1% 2019 2020: 57.1% 2020 2021: 68.2% 2021 2022: 53.8% 2022 2023: 51.5% 2023 2024: 60.9% 2024 2025: 27.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200842819.0%
2009401845.0%
2010572442.1%
2011521426.9%
2012522344.2%
2013573459.6%
2014472655.3%
2015542648.1%
2016533362.3%
2017472348.9%
2018513568.6%
2019633657.1%
2020422457.1%
2021443068.2%
2022522853.8%
2023663451.5%
2024462860.9%
202529827.6%
20263400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 923 0.2% 16.1% 77.5% 3.1%
Action 2 485 1.2% 9.7% 81.9% 3.9%
Action 3 220 0.0% 5.9% 87.3% 4.5%
Action 4 117 0.0% 6.0% 84.6% 8.5%
Action 5 44 0.0% 2.3% 90.9% 4.5%
Action 6 28 0.0% 7.1% 78.6% 14.3%
Action 7 11 0.0% 9.1% 81.8% 9.1%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 228 office actions
All years 0.4% 8 of 1,839 office actions
Change +0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.7%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.1%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
41.7% 5/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 8/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 28, 2020 14/740,867 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Nov. 9, 2018 14/095,267 Reversed §103
Nov. 9, 2017 13/516,827 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
May. 15, 2017 12/934,282 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 23, 2017 13/494,117 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Mar. 10, 2016 12/766,212 Reversed §103
Nov. 5, 2014 11/215,611 Affirmed §102 · §103
Sep. 18, 2013 11/209,266 Affirmed N/A
May. 14, 2013 10/942,075 Reversed §102 · §103
Apr. 29, 2013 11/558,968 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 21, 2013 10/910,680 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 29, 2012 10/869,277 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.