Examiner Mark W. Bockelman

Grant ratio: 71.6% (46th percentile in Art Unit 3766 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.69. Most common rejection type: §103.

Potentially inactive Last office action in data: June 2026
Grant ratio 71.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.69
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
70013
Primary art unit
3766
Work group
3760
Technology center
3700
Applications
831
Granted applications
595

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 65.3% 2.23
Group 384 48.9% 2.11
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.77 1,475 office actions across 832 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 832 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 460 55.3%
2 OAs 225 27.0%
3 OAs 82 9.9%
4 OAs 40 4.8%
5+ OAs 25 3.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 60.7% 2008 2009: 60.0% 2009 2010: 65.0% 2010 2011: 75.7% 2011 2012: 69.0% 2012 2013: 71.2% 2013 2014: 74.4% 2014 2015: 66.7% 2015 2016: 74.5% 2016 2017: 65.3% 2017 2018: 85.2% 2018 2019: 76.0% 2019 2020: 81.0% 2020 2021: 88.4% 2021 2022: 92.3% 2022 2023: 78.7% 2023 2024: 82.8% 2024 2025: 39.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008281760.7%
2009301860.0%
2010201365.0%
2011372875.7%
2012422969.0%
2013664771.2%
2014433274.4%
2015483266.7%
2016473574.5%
2017493265.3%
2018615285.2%
2019503876.0%
2020584781.0%
2021433888.4%
2022393692.3%
2023473778.7%
2024584882.8%
2025411639.0%
20262400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 832 3.4% 7.9% 52.8% 4.1%
Action 2 372 5.6% 5.4% 67.7% 4.3%
Action 3 147 4.1% 1.4% 76.9% 4.1%
Action 4 65 6.2% 3.1% 75.4% 6.2%
Action 5 25 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 4.0%
Action 6 13 0.0% 0.0% 84.6% 7.7%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.8% 6 of 215 office actions
All years 4.0% 59 of 1,475 office actions
Change -1.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.3%
4.4%
6.3%
0.0%
2.5%
0.9%
2014: Alice
2.9%
1.8%
2.9%
3.8%
5.6%
2019: PEG
16.1%
6.7%
3.3%
1.5%
5.7%
2024: AI examples
3.1%
2025: August memo
1.7%
3.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 26, 2025 15/702,630 Reversed §103
Sep. 29, 2014 10/805,016 Affirmed in part N/A
Jul. 19, 2012 10/977,336 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 6, 2011 11/042,807 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 9, 2011 10/896,648 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.