Examiner Brian T. Gedeon

Grant ratio: 80.7% (94th percentile in Art Unit 3766 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.44. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 80.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.44
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81439
Primary art unit
3766
Work group
3760
Technology center
3700
Applications
1,402
Granted applications
1,132
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3447
Supervisor
David E. Hamaoui
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5625

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 65.3% 2.23
Group 384 48.9% 2.11
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.45 2,033 office actions across 1,402 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 1,397 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 0.4%
1 OA 968 69.0%
2 OAs 299 21.3%
3 OAs 79 5.6%
4 OAs 31 2.2%
5+ OAs 20 1.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 80.0% 2008 2009: 90.4% 2009 2010: 79.7% 2010 2011: 81.6% 2011 2012: 84.1% 2012 2013: 90.8% 2013 2014: 93.6% 2014 2015: 92.8% 2015 2016: 88.8% 2016 2017: 91.5% 2017 2018: 87.2% 2018 2019: 86.9% 2019 2020: 89.5% 2020 2021: 88.0% 2021 2022: 86.7% 2022 2023: 80.0% 2023 2024: 88.1% 2024 2025: 32.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008655280.0%
2009736690.4%
2010796379.7%
2011766281.6%
2012887484.1%
2013766990.8%
201410910293.6%
2015696492.8%
2016807188.8%
2017948691.5%
2018786887.2%
2019615386.9%
2020766889.5%
2021756688.0%
2022605286.7%
2023504080.0%
2024595288.1%
2025752432.0%
20265900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,397 0.6% 7.7% 41.9% 0.9%
Action 2 429 0.2% 10.3% 56.6% 0.9%
Action 3 130 0.8% 6.2% 64.6% 6.9%
Action 4 51 0.0% 5.9% 82.4% 0.0%
Action 5 20 0.0% 0.0% 85.0% 5.0%
Action 6 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.7% 2 of 267 office actions
All years 0.5% 11 of 2,033 office actions
Change +0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.6%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
1.5%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.0%
1.0%
0.0%
4.3%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.0%
1.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.7 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 23, 2016 12/236,836 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 4, 2015 12/685,445 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
May. 11, 2015 12/050,463 Reversed N/A
Aug. 14, 2014 11/058,572 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 25, 2013 10/786,359 Affirmed §102 · §103
Dec. 14, 2011 11/116,963 Affirmed §103
Sep. 27, 2011 11/120,633 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.