Examiner Jeremiah Kimball

Grant ratio: 71.4% (42nd percentile in Art Unit 3766 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.45. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: March 2017
Grant ratio 71.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.45
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85542
Primary art unit
3766
Work group
3760
Technology center
3700
Applications
259
Granted applications
185

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 65.3% 2.23
Group 384 48.9% 2.11
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.41 624 office actions across 259 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 259 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 95 36.7%
2 OAs 70 27.0%
3 OAs 36 13.9%
4 OAs 36 13.9%
5+ OAs 22 8.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 28.6% 2008 2009: 65.8% 2009 2010: 72.2% 2010 2011: 70.6% 2011 2012: 86.4% 2012 2013: 73.5% 2013 2014: 73.0% 2014 2015: 68.2% 2015 2016: 73.1% 2016 2017: 100.0% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20087228.6%
2009382565.8%
2010362672.2%
2011342470.6%
2012221986.4%
2013342573.5%
2014372773.0%
2015221568.2%
2016261973.1%
201733100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 259 1.5% 10.0% 74.1% 3.5%
Action 2 164 0.0% 3.7% 92.1% 1.8%
Action 3 94 0.0% 6.4% 87.2% 3.2%
Action 4 58 0.0% 1.7% 93.1% 0.0%
Action 5 22 0.0% 0.0% 95.5% 4.5%
Action 6 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.6% 4 of 624 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
6.3%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 3, 2015 11/518,099 Reversed N/A
Jul. 21, 2015 11/833,217 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 11, 2013 11/800,653 Affirmed in part §103
Apr. 11, 2013 11/206,656 Affirmed §103
Mar. 25, 2013 11/669,350 Affirmed §102 · §103
Mar. 22, 2013 11/414,515 Affirmed §103
Nov. 30, 2012 10/561,334 Reversed §103
Nov. 27, 2012 11/846,142 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.