Examiner Bhisma Mehta

Grant ratio: 62.6% (65th percentile in Art Unit 3767 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.47. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2021
Grant ratio 62.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.47
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
73608
Primary art unit
3767
Work group
3760
Technology center
3700
Applications
318
Granted applications
199

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 11 46.9% 2.45
Group 384 48.9% 2.11
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.31 734 office actions across 318 applications
Applications with office actions 98.1% 312 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 1.9%
1 OA 96 30.2%
2 OAs 109 34.3%
3 OAs 51 16.0%
4 OAs 34 10.7%
5+ OAs 22 6.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 48.1% 2008 2009: 78.3% 2009 2010: 50.0% 2010 2011: 71.6% 2011 2012: 80.8% 2012 2013: 44.4% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 25.0% 2015 2020: 0.0% 2020 2021: 0.0% 2021

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008271348.1%
2009695478.3%
2010582950.0%
2011674871.6%
2012524280.8%
2013271244.4%
2014700.0%
20154125.0%
2020500.0%
2021200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 312 1.6% 17.9% 58.0% 5.1%
Action 2 216 0.5% 19.0% 56.0% 7.4%
Action 3 107 0.0% 15.9% 65.4% 7.5%
Action 4 56 0.0% 12.5% 69.6% 5.4%
Action 5 22 0.0% 4.5% 77.3% 9.1%
Action 6 11 0.0% 18.2% 81.8% 0.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 1 office actions
All years 0.8% 6 of 734 office actions
Change -0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.7%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
4.6%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 5, 2022 15/962,644 Affirmed §103
Oct. 23, 2013 12/289,264 Reversed §102
Mar. 18, 2013 11/706,634 Reversed §103
Mar. 12, 2013 12/030,590 Affirmed §102 · §103
Feb. 26, 2013 11/623,641 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 14, 2013 11/281,526 Affirmed §103
Jan. 17, 2013 10/695,848 Reversed §103
Dec. 6, 2012 11/585,045 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.