Examiner Michael Brown

Grant ratio: 82.4% (99th percentile in Art Unit 3772 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.76. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2016
Grant ratio 82.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.76
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
65949
Primary art unit
3772
Work group
3770
Technology center
3700
Applications
846
Granted applications
697

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 49 36.1% 2.02
Group 269 49.0% 2.08
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.71 1,448 office actions across 846 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 846 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 489 57.8%
2 OAs 211 24.9%
3 OAs 86 10.2%
4 OAs 37 4.4%
5+ OAs 23 2.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 63.5% 2008 2009: 77.1% 2009 2010: 83.5% 2010 2011: 84.9% 2011 2012: 87.8% 2012 2013: 87.6% 2013 2014: 81.2% 2014 2015: 83.3% 2015 2016: 90.3% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008744763.5%
20091058177.1%
20101038683.5%
20111069084.9%
2012746587.8%
20131139987.6%
2014856981.2%
20151149583.3%
2016726590.3%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 846 0.7% 13.4% 55.4% 8.0%
Action 2 357 0.0% 13.4% 54.6% 6.4%
Action 3 146 0.0% 10.3% 63.7% 4.8%
Action 4 60 0.0% 11.7% 50.0% 11.7%
Action 5 23 0.0% 13.0% 60.9% 4.3%
Action 6 11 0.0% 18.2% 63.6% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.4% 6 of 1,448 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.7%
0.0%
0.5%
2014: Alice
0.7%
1.1%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.6 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 15, 2016 12/852,380 Affirmed §102 · §103
Apr. 30, 2013 12/287,121 Reversed N/A
Feb. 7, 2013 11/592,529 Reversed §102 · §103
Dec. 6, 2012 11/592,616 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A
Apr. 17, 2012 10/422,350 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Mar. 22, 2012 10/139,513 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.