Examiner Kari Petrik

Grant ratio: 48.2% (60th percentile in Art Unit 3772 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.52. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 48.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.52
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82001
Primary art unit
3772
Work group
3770
Technology center
3700
Applications
450
Granted applications
217
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1909
Supervisor
Alireza Nia
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3076

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 49 36.1% 2.02
Group 269 49.0% 2.08
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.15 981 office actions across 456 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 456 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 193 42.3%
2 OAs 131 28.7%
3 OAs 59 12.9%
4 OAs 42 9.2%
5+ OAs 31 6.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 0.0% 2010 2011: 27.0% 2011 2012: 43.5% 2012 2013: 59.3% 2013 2014: 62.1% 2014 2015: 38.1% 2015 2016: 56.5% 2016 2017: 61.5% 2017 2018: 69.4% 2018 2019: 62.5% 2019 2020: 84.6% 2020 2025: 13.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2010100.0%
2011371027.0%
2012462043.5%
2013543259.3%
2014291862.1%
2015421638.1%
2016623556.5%
2017261661.5%
2018362569.4%
2019483062.5%
2020131184.6%
202530413.3%
20262600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 456 1.3% 14.7% 69.3% 4.4%
Action 2 263 0.8% 10.6% 79.5% 4.9%
Action 3 132 0.0% 7.6% 81.1% 9.1%
Action 4 73 0.0% 4.1% 79.5% 15.1%
Action 5 31 0.0% 12.9% 83.9% 3.2%
Action 6 14 7.1% 7.1% 78.6% 7.1%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 84 office actions
All years 0.9% 9 of 981 office actions
Change -0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.9%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
2.2%
3.0%
2019: PEG
2.4%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.1 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 10, 2019 14/444,733 Affirmed §103
May. 1, 2018 13/241,865 Reversed §102
Dec. 28, 2017 12/803,244 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 20, 2017 12/844,885 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 20, 2017 12/452,530 Affirmed in part §103
Nov. 30, 2016 13/116,749 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Sep. 12, 2016 12/631,300 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.