Examiner Leslie Ann Lopez

Grant ratio: 56.1% (49th percentile in Art Unit 3774 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.14. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 56.1%
Average office actions / grant 3.14
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87319
Primary art unit
3774
Work group
3770
Technology center
3700
Applications
695
Granted applications
390
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7044
Supervisor
Thomas Barrett
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4746

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 58 43.9% 1.95
Group 269 49.0% 2.08
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.94 2,042 office actions across 695 applications
Applications with office actions 96.1% 668 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 27 3.9%
1 OA 151 21.7%
2 OAs 196 28.2%
3 OAs 111 16.0%
4 OAs 87 12.5%
5+ OAs 123 17.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 100.0% 2008 2010: 100.0% 2010 2011: 30.4% 2011 2012: 40.6% 2012 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 32.5% 2014 2015: 26.7% 2015 2016: 53.3% 2016 2017: 62.0% 2017 2018: 67.4% 2018 2019: 71.6% 2019 2020: 74.6% 2020 2021: 86.5% 2021 2022: 85.4% 2022 2023: 78.6% 2023 2024: 87.9% 2024 2025: 31.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200811100.0%
201011100.0%
201123730.4%
2012321340.6%
2013361850.0%
2014401332.5%
201530826.7%
2016301653.3%
2017503162.0%
2018463167.4%
2019674871.6%
2020634774.6%
2021524586.5%
2022413585.4%
2023423378.6%
2024332987.9%
2025451431.1%
20266300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 668 0.3% 27.8% 67.7% 2.7%
Action 2 517 0.0% 18.8% 75.6% 2.5%
Action 3 321 0.0% 15.3% 78.2% 4.4%
Action 4 210 0.0% 10.5% 84.8% 2.4%
Action 5 123 0.0% 7.3% 86.2% 2.4%
Action 6 76 0.0% 9.2% 78.9% 5.3%
Action 7 48 0.0% 8.3% 85.4% 2.1%
Action 8 33 0.0% 9.1% 84.8% 6.1%
Action 9 19 0.0% 10.5% 89.5% 0.0%
Action 10 14 0.0% 21.4% 57.1% 21.4%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.7% 2 of 287 office actions
All years 0.1% 2 of 2,042 office actions
Change +0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.5%
2025: August memo
1.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
70.0% 7/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
70.0% 7/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 26, 2023 14/941,127 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jul. 29, 2021 15/522,406 Reversed §103
Mar. 27, 2020 14/976,070 Affirmed §103
Aug. 2, 2019 12/862,033 Reversed §103
Jul. 24, 2019 13/191,647 Reversed §103
Apr. 29, 2019 11/572,061 Reversed §102 · §103
May. 30, 2017 13/920,847 Reversed §102 · §103
Feb. 22, 2017 13/364,265 Reversed §103
Aug. 31, 2016 13/458,242 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Dec. 30, 2015 11/815,757 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.