Examiner Olivia C Chang

Grant ratio: 78.5% (86th percentile in Art Unit 3775 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.12. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 78.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.12
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87680
Primary art unit
3775
Work group
3770
Technology center
3700
Applications
764
Granted applications
600
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5017
Supervisor
Thomas Barrett
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4746

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 62.3% 2.17
Group 269 49.0% 2.08
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.10 1,603 office actions across 764 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 763 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 306 40.1%
2 OAs 266 34.8%
3 OAs 96 12.6%
4 OAs 46 6.0%
5+ OAs 49 6.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 23.8% 2011 2012: 69.8% 2012 2013: 83.7% 2013 2014: 75.0% 2014 2015: 84.3% 2015 2016: 91.2% 2016 2017: 91.4% 2017 2018: 90.3% 2018 2019: 83.3% 2019 2020: 95.9% 2020 2021: 93.6% 2021 2022: 82.6% 2022 2023: 77.5% 2023 2024: 98.2% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201121523.8%
2012533769.8%
2013494183.7%
2014443375.0%
2015514384.3%
2016575291.2%
2017585391.4%
2018625690.3%
2019544583.3%
2020494795.9%
2021474493.6%
2022463882.6%
2023403177.5%
2024555498.2%
2025422150.0%
20263600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 763 1.0% 30.5% 52.8% 14.3%
Action 2 457 0.9% 25.6% 61.7% 10.3%
Action 3 191 1.0% 22.5% 67.0% 8.4%
Action 4 95 1.1% 22.1% 67.4% 8.4%
Action 5 49 0.0% 26.5% 71.4% 2.0%
Action 6 22 0.0% 13.6% 81.8% 4.5%
Action 7 12 0.0% 33.3% 41.7% 16.7%
Action 8 7 0.0% 28.6% 71.4% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.2% 5 of 228 office actions
All years 0.9% 15 of 1,603 office actions
Change +1.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
3.7%
1.5%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.2%
2025: August memo
0.0%
7.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
83.3% 5/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
83.3% 5/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 13, 2026 17/328,132 Reversed §102
Jun. 5, 2017 13/756,814 Reversed §102 · §103
Jan. 17, 2017 12/442,328 Reversed §102 · §112
Mar. 24, 2016 13/000,228 Reversed §102 · §103
Feb. 17, 2016 12/294,292 Affirmed §103
Nov. 16, 2015 12/670,147 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.