Examiner Amy Sipp

Grant ratio: 59.0% (18th percentile in Art Unit 3775 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.73. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 59.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.73
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90468
Primary art unit
3775
Work group
3770
Technology center
3700
Applications
603
Granted applications
356
Examiner phone
(313) 446-6553
Supervisor
Tommy Worden
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4876

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 61.8% 2.17
Group 270 48.5% 2.08
Tech Center 2,685 47.8% 2.01
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.69 1,621 office actions across 603 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 602 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.2%
1 OA 182 30.2%
2 OAs 168 27.9%
3 OAs 91 15.1%
4 OAs 81 13.4%
5+ OAs 80 13.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 66.7% 2013 2014: 55.6% 2014 2015: 62.1% 2015 2016: 64.1% 2016 2017: 68.1% 2017 2018: 83.3% 2018 2019: 74.1% 2019 2020: 82.2% 2020 2021: 68.9% 2021 2022: 72.1% 2022 2023: 62.5% 2023 2024: 71.9% 2024 2025: 45.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20133266.7%
2014362055.6%
2015291862.1%
2016392564.1%
2017473268.1%
2018544583.3%
2019544074.1%
2020453782.2%
2021453168.9%
2022684972.1%
2023241562.5%
2024322371.9%
2025421945.2%
20268500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 602 0.3% 12.8% 72.6% 13.5%
Action 2 420 0.0% 8.1% 79.5% 11.0%
Action 3 252 0.0% 5.6% 81.7% 11.9%
Action 4 161 0.0% 4.3% 85.7% 8.7%
Action 5 80 0.0% 2.5% 86.3% 8.8%
Action 6 43 0.0% 4.7% 95.3% 0.0%
Action 7 21 0.0% 4.8% 95.2% 0.0%
Action 8 15 0.0% 6.7% 86.7% 6.7%
Action 9 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.6% 2 of 350 office actions
All years 0.1% 2 of 1,621 office actions
Change +0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 9 reversed.

Full reversal rate
90.0% 9/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 10/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 19, 2022 14/485,879 Reversed §102
Aug. 26, 2020 13/784,144 Reversed N/A
Oct. 17, 2019 13/522,611 Reversed §103 · §112
Oct. 2, 2019 14/091,902 Reversed §103
May. 23, 2019 12/919,516 Reversed §103
Jun. 25, 2018 13/435,644 Reversed §103
Sep. 26, 2017 13/558,777 Reversed §103
Jun. 13, 2017 12/857,034 Reversed §102 · §103
Jan. 3, 2017 13/586,344 Affirmed in part §103
Dec. 28, 2016 13/592,178 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.