Examiner Elmer Chao

Grant ratio: 61.9% (70th percentile in Art Unit 3777 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.03. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: August 2022
Grant ratio 61.9%
Average office actions / grant 3.03
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82407
Primary art unit
3777
Work group
3770
Technology center
3700
Applications
493
Granted applications
305

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 15 48.3% 2.79
Group 269 49.0% 2.08
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.74 1,383 office actions across 504 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 504 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 142 28.2%
2 OAs 138 27.4%
3 OAs 76 15.1%
4 OAs 77 15.3%
5+ OAs 71 14.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 15.8% 2008 2009: 65.5% 2009 2010: 63.3% 2010 2011: 50.0% 2011 2012: 45.5% 2012 2013: 54.2% 2013 2014: 68.3% 2014 2015: 71.4% 2015 2016: 73.5% 2016 2017: 67.6% 2017 2018: 65.8% 2018 2019: 71.4% 2019 2020: 62.1% 2020 2022: 100.0% 2022

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200819315.8%
2009553665.5%
2010301963.3%
2011341750.0%
2012331545.5%
2013482654.2%
2014604168.3%
2015282071.4%
2016493673.5%
2017342367.6%
2018382565.8%
2019352571.4%
2020291862.1%
202211100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 504 1.6% 4.8% 86.7% 4.6%
Action 2 362 2.5% 3.0% 86.2% 5.8%
Action 3 224 0.4% 3.6% 85.3% 6.3%
Action 4 148 1.4% 3.4% 78.4% 13.5%
Action 5 71 4.2% 1.4% 78.9% 8.5%
Action 6 41 0.0% 2.4% 80.5% 9.8%
Action 7 17 0.0% 5.9% 94.1% 0.0%
Action 8 9 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 11.1%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 1.7% 23 of 1,383 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2.5%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.7%
4.1%
3.4%
5.4%
2.2%
2019: PEG
3.5%
2.2%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 2/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
60.0% 6/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 29, 2021 14/883,004 Reversed §103 · §112
Aug. 29, 2019 13/440,223 Reversed §103 · §112
Feb. 28, 2017 12/108,070 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Apr. 20, 2016 12/777,671 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Mar. 1, 2016 12/314,059 Affirmed §102 · §103
May. 22, 2015 11/418,654 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 15, 2013 10/844,056 Affirmed §102 · §103
Mar. 21, 2013 10/800,957 Affirmed in part N/A
Aug. 22, 2012 10/984,319 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 2, 2011 10/231,311 Affirmed in part §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.