Examiner Cynthia Collado

Grant ratio: 48.9% (63rd percentile in Art Unit 3781 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.37. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: June 2019
Grant ratio 48.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.37
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81055
Primary art unit
3781
Work group
3780
Technology center
3700
Applications
775
Granted applications
379

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 56 46.0% 2.06
Group 297 41.7% 1.90
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.11 1,700 office actions across 804 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 804 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 389 48.4%
2 OAs 191 23.8%
3 OAs 101 12.6%
4 OAs 59 7.3%
5+ OAs 64 8.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 57.7% 2008 2009: 16.1% 2009 2010: 38.5% 2010 2011: 37.9% 2011 2012: 36.5% 2012 2013: 53.1% 2013 2014: 47.8% 2014 2015: 61.3% 2015 2016: 56.9% 2016 2017: 52.6% 2017 2018: 63.5% 2018 2019: 81.0% 2019

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008523057.7%
2009621016.1%
2010652538.5%
2011662537.9%
2012632336.5%
2013965153.1%
2014673247.8%
2015623861.3%
2016583356.9%
2017784152.6%
2018855463.5%
2019211781.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 804 0.5% 14.9% 70.4% 10.1%
Action 2 415 0.0% 8.9% 82.9% 5.3%
Action 3 224 0.0% 5.8% 85.3% 6.3%
Action 4 123 0.0% 6.5% 87.8% 3.3%
Action 5 64 0.0% 6.3% 92.2% 0.0%
Action 6 41 0.0% 7.3% 85.4% 4.9%
Action 7 18 0.0% 5.6% 88.9% 5.6%
Action 8 8 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.2% 4 of 1,700 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.7%
0.0%
0.6%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 22. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 6 affirmed in part, and 11 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 11/22 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
77.3% 17/22 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.1 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 17, 2019 13/030,313 Reversed §103
Sep. 17, 2018 14/847,814 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 26, 2018 13/742,028 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
May. 18, 2018 13/849,280 Reversed §103
Aug. 8, 2017 12/014,506 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jul. 18, 2017 13/191,312 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jun. 7, 2017 13/533,442 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 28, 2017 12/631,087 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Jan. 24, 2017 13/374,680 Reversed §103
Oct. 24, 2016 12/359,011 Reversed N/A
Aug. 29, 2016 13/843,046 Affirmed in part §102
Jul. 28, 2016 13/450,168 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.