Examiner Christopher B. Mckinley

Grant ratio: 49.2% (66th percentile in Art Unit 3781 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.48. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2015
Grant ratio 49.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.48
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82793
Primary art unit
3781
Work group
3780
Technology center
3700
Applications
461
Granted applications
227

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 56 46.0% 2.06
Group 297 41.7% 1.90
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.21 1,018 office actions across 461 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 461 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 174 37.7%
2 OAs 147 31.9%
3 OAs 67 14.5%
4 OAs 42 9.1%
5+ OAs 31 6.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 35.2% 2008 2009: 60.3% 2009 2010: 37.9% 2010 2011: 42.6% 2011 2012: 50.0% 2012 2013: 62.0% 2013 2014: 54.9% 2014 2015: 100.0% 2015

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008712535.2%
2009583560.3%
2010662537.9%
2011682942.6%
2012643250.0%
2013794962.0%
2014512854.9%
201544100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 461 0.0% 15.6% 80.9% 1.7%
Action 2 287 0.3% 16.0% 80.8% 1.0%
Action 3 140 0.0% 17.1% 80.7% 2.1%
Action 4 73 0.0% 2.7% 91.8% 4.1%
Action 5 31 0.0% 6.5% 90.3% 0.0%
Action 6 16 0.0% 0.0% 93.8% 6.3%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 1,018 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
58.3% 7/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 8/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.0 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 23, 2015 12/629,564 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 2, 2015 11/876,831 Reversed N/A
Dec. 22, 2014 11/894,170 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A
Jul. 31, 2014 11/821,321 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 19, 2014 11/581,140 Reversed §103
May. 14, 2013 11/103,875 Reversed §103
Jan. 22, 2013 11/316,225 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 19, 2012 11/389,295 Affirmed §103
Sep. 26, 2012 11/391,715 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Aug. 8, 2012 11/101,804 Affirmed §103
Jun. 12, 2012 11/509,541 Reversed §103
Jan. 17, 2012 11/235,035 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.