Examiner Jessica Arble

Grant ratio: 53.1% (68th percentile in Art Unit 3781 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.40. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 53.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.40
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
93607
Primary art unit
3781
Work group
3780
Technology center
3700
Applications
458
Granted applications
243
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0544
Supervisor
Sarah Al-Hashimi
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7159

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 56 46.0% 2.06
Group 297 41.7% 1.90
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.18 997 office actions across 458 applications
Applications with office actions 97.4% 446 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 12 2.6%
1 OA 198 43.2%
2 OAs 111 24.2%
3 OAs 58 12.7%
4 OAs 40 8.7%
5+ OAs 39 8.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2017: 36.1% 2017 2018: 58.3% 2018 2019: 71.4% 2019 2020: 60.8% 2020 2021: 81.6% 2021 2022: 48.8% 2022 2023: 82.9% 2023 2024: 74.4% 2024 2025: 42.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2017361336.1%
2018482858.3%
2019493571.4%
2020513160.8%
2021383181.6%
2022412048.8%
2023413482.9%
2024433274.4%
2025451942.2%
20266600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 446 0.2% 2.5% 77.1% 2.9%
Action 2 248 0.0% 3.2% 92.7% 2.0%
Action 3 137 0.0% 4.4% 93.4% 0.7%
Action 4 79 0.0% 3.8% 91.1% 2.5%
Action 5 39 2.6% 0.0% 94.9% 2.6%
Action 6 25 0.0% 0.0% 96.0% 4.0%
Action 7 9 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 16.7% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 296 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 997 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 11, 2026 18/656,261 Reversed §103
Aug. 25, 2025 16/645,284 Affirmed §103
Jan. 28, 2025 15/557,256 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 22, 2023 15/453,955 Affirmed §103
May. 2, 2022 15/453,965 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 11, 2022 15/271,299 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.